
Related Articles
- Pharmaceutical industry 'rejoices' at demise of pioneering EPD allergy treatment
- Can the NHS ever be green?
- The struggle to save Alaska's 'illness-busting' wild berries
- Deforestation could fuel deadly spread of malaria, yellow fever and Lyme disease
- Shocking legacy of 'uranium poisonings' haunts Obama's looming mining decision
Ch-ch-changes
Eric Francis
1st October, 2008
Environmental toxins have given us lesbian seagulls and transgender crabs, but pollutants may also be causing gender ambiguity in humans, says Eric Francis
For all 17 years I’ve been writing about PCBs and dioxins, I’ve been reading about the subtle and not-so-subtle sexual effects of these chemicals and many others related to them. We all have. Whereas once science worried about skin pustules and cancer, today the main concerns about pollution are its effects on sex hormones, and the way they blur the distinctions between the genders. During this same time we’ve been watching the transgender movement develop around the world – that is, people whose gender identity is consciously shifting, and many who are opting for gender reassignment surgery. Could there be a connection between the chemical and sexual environments? Since the advent of the Kinsey scale, we have become more accepting of how gender and sexuality exist on a continuum, rather than as an either/or function. Studies on how environmental factors are influencing human gender identity are extremely rare. The topic seems shrouded in the general taboo on sexuality, and the more sensitive issues that surround homosexuality and transgender. Gay and transgender movements, for their part, seem unwilling to ascribe an environmental cause because of... To view the rest of this article - you must be a paying subscriber and Login
Previous Articles...
Members
ECOLOGIST COOKIES
Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.



