
Does a tonne of fossil carbon equal a tonne of biological carbon?
Related Articles
- Beijing's blue skies...or little white lies?
- Bjørn Lomborg: 'Five inches...? I can't even remember that figure'
- Sami reindeer herders struggle against Arctic oil and gas expansion
- Himalayan glaciers are 'not just melting, they are dying'
- Climate change fuels violence as hunger drives cattle poaching in East Africa
All carbon is not born equal
Eric Marx
17th November, 2009
Are we risking serious problems if action to tackle deforestation assumes that a tonne of tree carbon is the same as a tonne of fossil carbon?
Ranil Senanayake has never been content trying to influence those at the policymaking table – or even sitting at that table himself.
Instead, the maverick systems ecologist has tried to construct a new table altogether. He set about this by crisscrossing the globe in search of farming communities willing to adopt and be trained in 'analog forestry', a land restoration system he first began developing in the early 1980s in the upland hills of his native Sri Lanka.
The principles behind analog forestry are simple, and spring from the understanding that natural forests are some the most productive, and diverse, ecosystems on Earth.
Analog forestry sets out to mimic the original ecosystems, with subtle adjustments that mean they can be economically productive as well - yielding food and shelter as well as maintaining habitat in ways that will be familiar to those who have studied or who practice permaculture. The scheme also tries to strengthen rural communities, recognising that forests are their homes and livelihoods.
From tree to desk
Despite his preference for field work, Senanayake...
To view the rest of this article - you must be a paying subscriber and Login
Previous Articles...
Members
ECOLOGIST COOKIES
Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.



