Tree losing its leaves in the Beijing smog. Photo: Philip McMaster via Flickr.com.
Beijing's $5bn tree project - will it cut pollution?
16th March 2014
Beijing is to plant trees over an area 200 times the size of Central Park in the city's latest effort to neutralise its choking pollution. But Jun Yang asks - how much will the trees really help, unless accompanied by drastic reductions in emissions?
Trees can reduce pollution particles from Beijing’s air, but the magnitude of removal is far lower than the government would hope.
Beijing, the seat of the government, is on China’s industrial east coast and has been affected as much as the next city by polluted air.
Faced with the challenge, the local Beijing government initiated a program in 2012 that will invest a total of 30 billion RMB (US$4.7 billion) to construct 67,000 hectares of trees around Beijing in the next few years.
That’s the equivalent of two hundred Central Parks, spread across the city.
Adopting this unconventional control measure on such a large scale is a bold move for the local government in Beijing. But studies have shown that trees can reduce smog particles in the air both directly and indirectly.
To directly reduce them, tree canopies can intercept particles already existing in the air. Indirectly, trees can lower air temperatures through providing shade and evapotranspiration - when water is breathed into the atmosphere through vegetation.
The cooling effect this has reduces the need for energy-using fans and air conditioners, which further lowers emissions. Also, the rates of photochemical reactions in the urban atmosphere are slowed down by the lowered air temperature and less secondary air pollutants are produced.
But some trees can make the pollution worse
The species of trees to use and where to plant more than 100 million of them can have a significant impact on the effectiveness of this control measure in Beijing.
Trees can actually become a source of air pollution too. Some tree species are high emitters of biogenic volatile organic compounds. These react with nitrous oxides and other chemicals in the air to form ozone and secondary organic aerosols, which are tiny 'tar balls' found to have bad health effects.
Ozone is the main component of urban smog and secondary organic aerosols are also a source.
Six tree species that have been used extensively in planting across the city are high emitters of the potentially problematic biogenic volatile organic compounds, which could add to problems down the line.
It has been suggested that more vegetation in urban environments could reduce the dispersion of smog particles from urban areas. Urban forests can potentially decrease the strength of convective mixing - where air pollutants are lofted up and away from the surface, taking them out of contact with people.
The 'urban boundary layer' of the urban atmosphere is also lowered, trapping heat and pollutants closer to the the earth's surface. So it’s important that the right trees are planted.
Pollution will be reduced - but not as much as hoped
Supported by the National Geographic Air and Water Conservation Fund, my group is currently studying just how effective urban forests could be in Beijing.
The initial results from our study are mixed. Trees planted in the last two years can reduce pollution particles from Beijing’s air, but the magnitude of removal is far lower than the government would hope.
Currently we are still in the process of modelling what the long-term effects will be once all the trees have been planted and matured. This means it's too early to say what the final impacts of trees are on smog particles in Beijing.
But, based on a study of ten US cities, urban trees did remove smog particles and improve the air quality of those cities by 0.05%-0.24%. Based on this, the improvement would be higher in Beijing due to the higher concentration of smog particles, though the reduction is unlikely to be as significant as hoped for by the government.
Don't forget the day job - cutting emissions!
So, what is the message for other cities? Making cities greener by planting urban forests should not be treated as a stand-alone air pollution control measure.
In fact, measures that are more effective but also more painful to implement should be giving the priority, such as reducing the use of cars.
Urban forests can play an important role in making cities nicer places to live and they do have cooling, pollution-reducing effects. But, it’s important to remember that it is our growing use of cars and industrial emissions that are the source of the smog; sadly no amount of trees can counteract this.
Jun Yang receives funding from National Geographic Air and Water Conservation Fund
Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.