Rabbits were first introduced into Britain during the Roman times
Rabbits named Britain's most costly invasive species
James Meikle, guardian special correspondent
15th December, 2010
Britain's estimated 40 million rabbits cost more than £260m a year in damage to crops, businesses and infrastructure, report says
They were introduced to Britain by the Romans, are hated as pests and celebrated in children's books. Britain's estimated 40 million rabbits cost the economy more than £260m a year including damage to crops, businesses and infrastructure, a report says today.
Their near 1,000-year survival as a non-native species makes them the costliest natural invader, according to research for the English, Scottish and Welsh governments by CABI, the international agriculture and environment organisation.
Japanese knotweed, introduced in the mid-19th century as an ornamental garden plant, has had far less time to rack up its own costly threats to the economy as it colonises roadsides, riverbanks and derelict land.
The total cost of such invasive species now reaches £1.7bn a year, mostly to the English economy, more than £250m in Scotland and £133m in Wales.
But the report also provides justification for the high costs of controlling non-natives. It is estimated that the current eradication programme for water primrose, a group of South American aquatic weeds which grow rapidly and can block waterways, will cost £73,000 – significantly less than the estimated £242m it would cost if the weeds were to become widely established as they have in in countries including France and Belgium.
Eradicating the grey squirrel, the North American 19th-century import which has put the native red in peril, may no longer be possible, the report concedes. An attempt to remove the species from Anglesey alone has so far cost £440,000. A conservative estimate puts the cost of a similar programme across Britain at £850m.
Even that would be relatively small if the Asian long-horned beetle, a wood-boring menace from Japan, Korea and China, and now threatening North American trees, became established in this country. The report suggests it would cost over £1.3bn to remove it from hardwood forests alone, let alone clear it from parks, gardens and hedgerows.
Richard Benyon, minister for the natural environment, said: 'Invasive non-native species have a significant impact on the British economy and damage our own wildlife. The costs of controlling these species will rise unless society takes steps to prevent them taking hold and spreading.'
'It becomes increasingly difficult and costly to control invasive non-native species as they become more established. Taking early action may seem expensive, but this report shows that it is the most effective approach, saving money in the long run and helping our native wildlife to thrive.'
Roseanna Cunningham, Scottish minister for environment and climate change, said: 'A better understanding of the negative impacts of invasive non-native species can help us raise awareness to help prevent introductions in the first place and to better respond to problems.'
Top 10 economic menaces
Rabbits £263m a year
Japanese knotweed £179m
Common field speedwell/wild oat £100m
Potato cyst nematode £50m
Non-native deer £35m
Varroa mite (a parasite of bees) £27m
Floating pennywort £25m
House mouse £18m
Farmers could be allowed to kill badgers from 2011
Government says vaccination on its own is not enough to stop the spread of bovine TB in cattle and announces plans to grant farmers culling licences
A wildlife-friendly garden - ponds, baths and natural pest control
Making a garden attractive to winged wildlife means more than just leaving out food during the winter months - here are some top tips on gardening beyond veg!
|HOW TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE
How to get involved in wildlife conservation
From joining campaigns groups to making your garden more wildlife friendly, there are many ways to get involved with saving the natural world. Read on for inspiration...
'Alarming decline' in England's biodiversity
England becoming a country of 'beauty spots rather than beauty', and must act fast to address declining biodiversity, says the government’s environment watchdog
Conservation and food production should be kept separate says study
Researchers claim the benefits of combining conservation and food production through organic farming are not enough to make up for the drop in yields
Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.