Boots, KFC, McDonalds ignore rainforest destruction survey
10th February, 2010
Marks and Spencer and Sainsbury’s have been praised for disclosing their ‘forest footprint’ but experts say that consumers are still not aware of the impact of their daily diet
A project has been lauched to inform consumers and investors about the link between corporate activity and deforestation.
Similar to the Carbon Disclosure Project, the Forest Footprint Disclosure Project (FFDP) calls on companies to disclose their ‘forest footprint’ and provide information about what they are doing to reduce it.
More than 200 of the world’s leading companies were surveyed on their involvement with ‘forest risk commodities’ such as timber, palm oil, beef, leather, soy and biofuels.
A number of notable companies operating in the UK failed to respond to the survey including Boots, KFC and McDonalds.
Boots said it was unfair for it to be associated with deforestation.
'We use 0.1 per cent of the volume of palm oil that Sainsbury’s use. On the one hand we want to be open, honest and transparent but there has to be a sense of reality over volume and usage,’ said Richard Ellis, Head of Corporate Social Responsibility at Alliance Boots.
Eating the rainforest
Forest Footprint Disclosure (FFD) chair Andrew Mitchell said that consumers still have little awareness of the impact everyday products have on forests.
‘Consumers “eat” rainforests daily in beef burgers, bacon and beauty products, but without knowing it.
‘Because of growing demand for beef, soy, and palm oil, which are in much of what we consume, as well as timber and biofuels, rainforests are now worth more cut down than standing up,’ he said.
Mitchell called on governments and companies to make urgent investments to avoid the costs of further deforestation.
‘There will be no solution to climate change without a solution to deforestation. Our disclosure approach is intended to make companies sit up and take notice of their corporate responsibility to make downsizing their forest footprint a priority,' he said.
The report also highlighted that 80 per cent of land deforested in the Amazon between 1996 and 2006 was now being used for cattle pasture and recommended a certification system to enable buyers to make informed choices on animal products.
However Simon Counsell, Executive Director of the Rainforest Foundation urged caution on the potential of voluntary certification schemes as a means of eliminating negative environmental impacts.
‘If the project’s real potential is to be fulfilled, we would really need to see governments, and especially the European Union, acting to regulate trade in these destructive products,’ he said.
The Forest Footprint Disclosure Project
The Rainforest Foundation
How can we tell which companies are really green?
Green claims are everywhere: surely there must be some simple way of measuring exactly what impact a company is having on the climate?
Palm oil plantations could be classified as forests
European Commission guidance would allow biofuels to be labelled as sustainable even if forests have been destroyed to make way for the palm oil plantations
UK companies failing on carbon reduction targets
Carphone Warehouse and British American Tobacco among companies refusing to reveal data on carbon emissions
Google, McDonalds and Amazon dodge carbon disclosure
Survey of whether UK's biggest brands are reducing their carbon emissions finds more greenwash than progress
Major retailers ranked on sustainable palm oil
Tesco and Waitrose lagging behind on sustainable sourcing of world's most traded edible oil, found in wide range of everyday products from cakes and cosmetics
Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.