The Ecologist




 

The public remain uninformed about the real crisis in the food system, says soil association director Patrick Holden

More articles about
Related Articles

Food crisis 'hidden' from public say campaigners

Ecologist

6th January, 2010

Government is talking about issues like food security, climate change and oil dependency but failing to take the 'inconvenient' but necessary action says the Soil Association

Key policy speeches by the UK food and farming minister and Government chief scientist this week fail to admit the changes needed in the food system, according to the leading organic farming body, the Soil Association.

Speaking at the annual Oxford Farming Conference this week, secretary of state for environment, food and rural affairs, Hilary Benn, said: 'Food security is as important to this country's future wellbeing - and the world's - as energy security. We need to produce more food. We need to do it sustainably.'

His speech was followed by one from the Government's chief scientist, Professor John Beddington, re-iterating his call for the use of genetically modified (GM) crops to increase production.

Wrong solution


However, Soil Association director Patrick Holden said neither GM technology, nor increasing food production would provide a long-term solution to tackling the food crisis.

He said the UK needed to phase out nitrogen fertilisers, switch to more rotational farming and reduce meat production - all of which he called 'inconvenient truths to the Government'.

'The constant availability of food draws us into a false sense of security,' Holden said. 'But really we are in a precarious position.

'The rhetoric of Government has changed; climate change, food security and oil and fossil fuel dependency are now all on the agenda but the inconvenient truth is that we if we are to tackle this issue then we will have to take action of the kind they do not want to discuss.

'We must give up nitrogen fertilisers and build soil fertility through crop rotation instead.

'I believe this one move will bring the most far-reaching change in agriculture since the agricultural revolution – and the most important,' he said.

Spending more on food

Holden also said consumers would have to face up to paying more for food - something sucessive governments have avoided discussing.

'In the 1970s we spent around 20 per cent of our income on food,' he said. 'That figure has now fallen to around 8-11 per cent...we pay too little for our food.'

Mr Holden added that only an 'informed public debate' on the current food system would bring the necessary changes, something he admitted the Soil Association and society as a whole had 'failed' to achieve.

Useful links

Oxford Farming Conference

Alternative rival - Oxford Real Farming Conference

 

Previous Articles...

Users Comments

Re: Food crisis 'hidden' from public say campaigners
Posted By moralman 1 January 7, 2010 11:58:59 AM

The would be greater food security if every town with a sewage works made use of anaerobic digestors. The methane produced could be burned to produce electricity, but more importantly heat, carbon dioxide and water. These three by-products would be used in nearby, purpose-built, community greenhouses to produce locally grown fruit and veg. And if the digestate is of suitable quality, it can be used as fertiliser. Local produce, local jobs, reduced waste, sustainable electricity. Why are we not doing it?

Re: Food crisis 'hidden' from public say campaigners
Posted By EC017270 1 January 11, 2010 10:07:56 AM

As a farmer the crisis is plain to see. Population is growing, availability of agricultural land is diminishing (development, desertification etc) and we rely on a system utterly dependent on fossil fuels and artificial fertilisers to achieve the yields we do. Even with GM (worries aside) a crisis is still inevitable. Moralman's point is timely, using our own sewage as a resource for fertiliser (and heat & power) may be the only sustainable option. However, the planet is now predominantly an urban society. To feed such centres of population commercial production will be needed over and above the important but limited contribution of community scale ventures. Farmers tend to be fairly practical at adopting new technology and are not adverse to getting mucky. However the research into and adoption of new technologies requires investment. Our current food system is controlled by multiple retailers, often taking up to 50% of retail prices for the benefit of shareholders, leaving precious little to support the changes on the ground we desperately need. Change on the land needs to be driven by wholesale change of the entire supply chain.

Re: Food crisis 'hidden' from public say campaigners
Posted By Dkgarden 1 April 2, 2010 10:31:35 AM

Hi I have started a petition against the further introduction of GM technology into UK & Eurpoe would you mind signing it and passing on the address please: http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/NOTOGM/
Post a Comment
 

Members