Photo: Quincas Moreira via Flickr (CC BY-NC).
Flint drinks lead-laden water; Republicans attack Clean Water Act
Farron Cousins / DesmogBlog.com
22nd January 2016
To save a small amount of money residents of Flint, Michigan, have been forced to consume hazardous levels of lead in their drinking water, writes Farron Cousins. Just the moment for the Republican House Speaker to attack the Clean Water Act.
To poison all the children in an historic American city is no small feat. Even international terrorist organizations haven't figured out yet how to do something on a magnitude like this. But you did.
As residents in the city struggle to find drinkable water, the National Guard has been deployed to help distribute bottled water to residents.
The crisis actually began about 18 months ago when Republican governor Rick Snyder made the decision to balance the city's budget at the expense of the health and safety of residents of Flint.
The governor and his appointed 'budget experts' decided to save the city some money by switching their water supply from the city of Detroit's supply to the Flint River.
And according to Occupy Democrats, this river was known to be both highly polluted and carried an unusually high salt content. The high salinity of this water caused the city's pipes to begin eroding, which then leached lead into the city's water.
They knew. And we know they knew
Again, the governor and state officials were aware of the lead problem the entire time it was happening, according to internal emails between the governor and officials. In spite of that knowledge, they waited 18 months before declaring a state of emergency.
And the public would have remained in the dark had it not been for medical professionals coming forward to explain what was happening to Flint residents and their children. The entire problem could have been avoided at a cost to the city of less than $100 per day.
In the midst of this crisis, and just days before the state of emergency was declared, Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan wrote an op-ed attacking the EPA's Clean Water Rule.
In the op-ed, Ryan declares that the stricter rules (finalized by the EPA this past summer which gives the agency authority to regulate smaller bodies of water to limit pollution) are a prime example of government overreach and that the only goal is for an "overzealous federal bureaucracy" to micromanage how citizens use water.
Describing the Act as "another example of Washington bureaucrats sticking their nose where it doesn't belong", Ryan points out in his article that 32 governors have filed lawsuits against the EPA and the Obama administration in order to block the rule from ever taking effect, and a Circuit Court temporarily blocked implementation of the rule back in October.
While Speaker Ryan claims that he objects to the rule because it does damage to small farmers and ranchers, his real goal is to protect the corporate powerhouses who lobbied against the new rules. Those wealthy interests include the US Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, mining company owners, and several businesses owned by the Koch brothers.
These groups have little to no interest in farming activities, but they are all either major polluters through their dirty energy businesses, or they represent the interests of polluters from both the energy and industrial manufacturing sectors.
Companies right to pollute trumps people's right to clean water
And according to a guy like Paul Ryan, the desire of companies to pollute entire towns is more important than the health and safety of American citizens.
Those health concerns are not hypothetical, either. Thanks to medical professionals in the city of Flint, we know exactly what kind of adverse health effects we're looking at as a result of Republican-sponsored pollution: impaired cognitive development, behavioral problems, and nervous system damage.
These are not short-term effects either, these problems will plague the residents of Flint - especially young children exposed to high amounts of lead - for the rest of their lives. Lead exposure and consumption at such a young age is also linked to increased crime among the exposed, and anti-social behavior.
As filmmaker Michael Moore, who is originally from Flint, put it: "To poison all the children in an historic American city is no small feat. Even international terrorist organizations haven't figured out yet how to do something on a magnitude like this. But you did.
"Your staff and others knew that the water in the Flint River was poison - but you decided that taking over the city and 'cutting costs' to 'balance the budget' was more important than the people's health (not to mention their democratic rights to elect their own leaders).
"So you cut off the clean, fresh glacial lake water of Lake Huron that the citizens of Flint (including myself) had been drinking for decades and, instead, made them drink water from the industrial cesspool we call the Flint River - a body of 'water' where toxins from a dozen General Motors and DuPont factories have been dumped for over a hundred years.
"And then you decided to put a chemical in this water to 'clean' it - which only ended up stripping the lead off of Flint's aging water pipes, placing that lead in the water and sending it straight into people's taps."
The crisis in Flint, Michigan will likely repeat itself if corporations continue to influence the behavior of our elected officials. It could become the new normal.
Farron Cousins is the executive editor of The Trial Lawyer magazine, and his articles have appeared on DeSmogBlog, The Huffington Post, Alternet, The Progressive Magazine. He is also co-host and producer of the Ring of Fire radio program. Follow him on Twitter @farronbalanced.
This article was originally published on DeSmogBlog. Some additional reporting by The Ecologist.
Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.