RCMP make an arrest at a protest rally against Kinder Morgan at Burnaby Mountain Park, 20th November 2014. Photo: Mark Klotz via Flickr (CC BY 2.0).
- If it's jobs they want, Labour and the unions must back renewables, not Hinkley C!
- If you're saying 'it' with flowers this UK Bank Holiday weekend make sure they're locally grown
- The hydrogen economy is much nearer than we think
- Dark days ahead for British agriculture? Or green shoots of a brighter future?
Tar sands campaigners are Canada's new 'terrorists'
5th March 2015
Canada's 'Anti-Terrorism Bill' proposes a massive increase in the power of security services, writes Pete Dolack - and in the crosshairs are campaigners against a tar sands industry that's intent on releasing 240 billion tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere, and those fighting the pipelines needed to get the heavy crude to market. Who are the real 'extremists'?
Bill C-51 brings massive changes to Canada's spying and security system - making it easier to lock people up without charge; criminalizing expression; vastly expanding the powers of Canada's spies; gutting privacy protections ...
Canada's Harper régime has invented the new crime of being a member of an 'anti-Canadian petroleum movement', and equating such a stance with terrorism.
Evidently believing it is in danger of losing the fight against pipeline projects intended to speed up Alberta tar sands production, its response is to place environmentalists under surveillance.
A secret report prepared by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the country's national police agency, claims that public activism against the problems caused by oil and gas extraction is a growing and violent threat to Canada's national security.
The report goes so far as to challenge the very idea that human activity is causing global warming or that global warming is even a problem. At least 97% of environmental scientists agree that human activity is causing global warming. The basis on which a police force can declare otherwise is surely not clear.
Whether police officials truly believe they understand the global climate better than scientists who are expert in the field or are merely providing 'intelligence' that the government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper wants to hear, I will leave to others more familiar than I with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.
Regardless, the RCMP report, leaked to Greenpeace, makes for amusing reading. For example on page five:
"[T]here is an apparent growing international anti-Canadian petroleum movement. In their literature, representatives of the movement claim climate change is now the most serious global environmental threat, and that climate change is a direct consequence of elevated anthropogenic greenhouse gases which, reportedly, are directly linked to the continued use of fossil fuels."
And whom might the police rely on for that statement? No, not those pesky scientists who refuse to say what is demanded of them by oil and gas companies and the right-wing governments who love them.
Instead, the RCMP quotes the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, cites a poll commissioned by a foundation connected to the oil industry, and a columnist at the Toronto Sun, a hard-right tabloid in the Murdoch mold.
The Sun columnist, as quoted in the police report, said "environmental radicals" seek "to undermine the development of Canada's oilsands - an insignificant contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions."
Actual experts in the field would disagree. A Scientific America analysis that quotes several climate scientists reports that if all the bitumen in the Alberta tar sands were burned, 240 Gt (billion tonnes) of carbon would be added to the atmosphere. The total amount of carbon that has been thrown into the atmosphere by humanity in all of history is estimated at 588 Gt.
Are going to believe the police or your lying eyes?
The Globe and Mail of Toronto quoted a Royal Canadian Mounted Police spokesman denying any intention of spying on peaceful protestors:
"There is no focus on environmental groups, but rather on the broader criminal threats to Canada's critical infrastructure. The RCMP does not monitor any environmental protest group. Its mandate is to investigate individuals involved in criminality."
But the newspaper's report noted that the spokesman "would not comment on the tone" of the report, which even The Globe and Mail, a leading establishment publication, found difficult to accept: the article had previously noted the RCMP report's "highly charged language."
Moreover, Canadian human rights organizations filed complaints earlier in February over spying on opponents of the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline, a project intended to move tar sands oil from Alberta to a port in northern British Columbia, passing through hundreds of miles of environmentally sensitive lands.
Environmentalists and Indigenous Peoples have been subjected to spying by the RCMP and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, according to a complaint filed by the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association.
The association is also opposing a new measure, the Anti-terrorism Act 2015, or Bill C-51, intended to "dramatically expand the powers of Canada's national security agencies." The association reports:
"Bill C-51 makes massive changes to many aspects of Canada's spying and security system. Any one of the changes - making it easier to lock people up without charge; criminalizing expression; vastly expanding the powers of Canada's spies; gutting privacy protections - is significant, raises constitutional questions, and must be the subject of serious debate.
"Lumping them all together into one bill, and proposing to speed that bill through Parliament, virtually guarantees that democratic debate on these proposed measures will be insufficient."
Such speed is consistent with the Harper government's attitude toward activists. A previous environment minister, Peter Kent, called parliamentary opponents of tar sands "treacherous" and had a long history of dismantling every regulation he could.
The current environment minister, Leona Aglukkaq, while less inclined to frontal attacks, nonetheless also doubts climate change.
From 'smoking is good for you' to 'the weather is just fine'
Global-warming denialism is well-funded, with oil and gas companies often the heaviest contributors to 'think tanks' that specialize in doubting scientific evidence on behalf of their corporate benefactors.
An excellent roundup of these deniers, written by physics professor John W. Farley for the May 2012 edition of Monthly Review, noted that Exxon Mobil Corporation, the Koch brothers and other special interests have spent tens of millions of dollars.
One of these corporate-funded 'think tanks' is the Heartland Institute, which began life as a Big Tobacco outfit issuing reports denying links between smoking and cancer.
Another global-warming denial outfit, The George C. Marshall Institute, originated as lobby group for Ronald Reagan's crackpot Strategic Defense Initiative, more commonly known as the 'Star Wars' program.
Yet another was the now-defunct Global Climate Coalition, which included major oil companies, the US Chamber of Commerce and automobile manufacturers. It actually operated from the offices of the National Association of Manufacturing.
A scientist who is often trotted out by global-warming deniers is Wei-Hock ('Willie') Soon, who was recently revealed to have taken more than $1.2 million from the fossil-fuel industry. The New York Times reports that at least 11 papers Dr. Soon has published since 2008 omitted disclosures of this funding and at least eight violate the ethical guidelines of the journals that published him. The Times reports:
"[D]ocuments show that Dr. Soon, in correspondence with his corporate funders, described many of his scientific papers as "deliverables" that he completed in exchange for their money. He used the same term to describe testimony he prepared for Congress."
Who are the real 'extremists'?
The world is facing an environmental catastrophe as it is. Increasing production from the Alberta tar sands will only hasten it. The capacity of railroads to ship oil is reaching its limit - and in itself is dangerous as a recent flurry of crashes demonstrates.
Thus pipelines are critical for tar sands expansion. Not only the Keystone XL pipeline across the United States, but the Northern Gateway and other proposed pipelines that would cross Canada to eastern ports.
US President Barack Obama's February 24th veto of a congressional bill designed to force Keystone construction by no means puts that issue to rest. The State Department's inaccurate claim that the pipeline would not add to global warming and falsehoods that tens of thousands of jobs would result remain an official document.
Opposition to the Keystone XL pipelines has not slackened and strong resistance continues against the Northern Gateway, which would not only send oil through sensitive mountains and forests, but would require ocean tankers to travel more than 100 kilometers just to reach the Pacific Ocean from the pipeline terminus in northern British Columbia.
From there, the oil would be shipped to Asia. First Nations peoples, who have the right to block projects from crossing their lands, are leading that fight, and vow physical resistance.
TransCanada Corporation, the same company that wants to build Keystone XL to the Gulf of Mexico, is also proposing an Energy East pipeline that would carry tar sands oil to terminals in Québec City and St. John, New Brunswick.
This project, if it comes to fruition, would alone produce the same amount of carbon each year as seven million new cars on Canada's roads, according to 350.org. Some of this project would use existing natural gas lines; these are not designed for oil, a heavier substance, elevating the risk of ruptures.
The RCMP reports asserts that "extremists pose a realistic criminal threat to Canada's petroleum industry." Advocating for clean air and water is a crime?
The fight against one of these pipelines must be a fight against them all. Increased oil profits surely won't be compensation for drowned cities and farmlands turned to dust bowls.
Pete Dolack writes the Systemic Disorder blog. He has been an activist with several groups.
This article was originally published on CounterPunch.
Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.