The Ecologist

 
Archive_5.jpg
More articles about
Related Articles

Bush ruling threatens US salmon’s survival

Chris Floyd

8th July, 2004

In May the Bush administration struck another blow against the US’s crumbling environmental protections with a ruling that allows hatchery fish to be counted along with wild fish in determining the protection status of salmon in accordance with the US’s Endangered Species Act (ESA).

Bush's own panel of scientific advisers unanimously rejected the change, saying that in-bred hatchery fish – which make up 80 percent of Pacific salmon populations – cannot replenish losses in populations of the 26 species of wild salmon now officially threatened with extinction.
 
Naturally spawned fish are heartier, stronger, and provide the vigorous genetic variations needed to maintain the salmon's survival in the wild. Filling streams with less-efficient, disease-prone hatchery breeds will give a false picture of species numbers and species survivability, the scientists say. But that seems to be the intention.

Although Bush's bureaucrats say there will be no change in the salmon's status 'for now', the ruling gives them the power – when the media heat is off – to gut environmental restrictions that have protected salmon habitats throughout the West from logging and commercial exploitation by agribusiness and property developers.
 
These corporate interests have fought long and hard (using lobbying and lawsuits) to eliminate salmon protections, which they say have cost them millions of dollars in potential profits. They have crossed Bush’s palm with copious amounts of campaign silver to make their dreams come true, and he has delivered. He appointed the logging industry’s top lobbyist, Mark Rutzick, to a key post in the US National Maritime Fisheries Service, which engineered the ESA rule change. So, it should be no surprise that the new edict closely mirrors logging industry proposals for which Rutzick had pushed for years.

The ruling could have devastating environmental consequences. Lifting salmon protections will increase the dumping of industrial and agricultural waste in rivers and streams. Marine and animal life dependent on the salmon, either directly or further up the food chain, will diminish. Another pocket of planet-sustaining biodiversity will wither into sterility.

As one sceptical biologist noted, the pretzel logic of the ruling is ‘like counting zoo animals’ when considering the overall health of a species. This new legal precedent could mean open season on protected species and their habitats throughout the US.

This article first appeared in the Ecologist July 2004

 

Previous Articles...

Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 

ECOLOGIST COOKIES

Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.

More information here...

 

FOLLOW
THE ECOLOGIST

 

Help us keep the Ecologist platform going

Since 2012, the Ecologist has been owned and published by a small UK-based charity called the Resurgence Trust. We work hard to support the kind of independent journalism and comment that we know Ecologist readers enjoy but we need your help to keep going. We do all this on a very small budget with a very small editorial team and so joining the Trust or making a donation will show us you value our work and support the platform which is currently offered as a free service.

Join The Resurgence TrustDonate to support the Resurgence Trust