
Related Articles
- Pharmaceutical industry 'rejoices' at demise of pioneering EPD allergy treatment
- Can the NHS ever be green?
- The struggle to save Alaska's 'illness-busting' wild berries
- Deforestation could fuel deadly spread of malaria, yellow fever and Lyme disease
- Shocking legacy of 'uranium poisonings' haunts Obama's looming mining decision
Amalgam fillings classified as 'hazardous waste'
Nick Kettles
1st May, 2008
Mercury is the second most toxic metal in the world, and yet it's still being used to make fillings. Nick Kettles wonders if the dental establishment is away with the tooth fairies.
It’s official: it’s safe to put hazardous waste in your mouth – and not just any run-of-the-mill hazardous waste, either. According to the European Waste Catalogue (entry 18 01 10), this particular hazardous waste possesses the hazardous property H6, meaning that it is toxic if inhaled or ingested, and may result in serious, acute or chronic health risks – even in death. Is this claim for safety being made by magician David Blaine? Or mystic yogis demonstrating their mastery over the mindbody continuum? No, this spectacular claim is the direct implication of separate advice given by the Department of Health (DoH) and Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) on dental amalgam. To view the rest of this article - you must be a paying subscriber and Login
Clearly not everybody knows that dental amalgam – the ‘silver’ fillings in their mouths – contains 50 per cent mercury, the second most toxic metal on the planet after plutonium, or the reason why it’s considered a hazardous waste in the first place.
According to DEFRA’s guidance for dentists – published in December 2005 and based on England and Wales Hazardous Waste Regulations, which in turn adhere to EU Waste Directives...
Previous Articles...
Members
ECOLOGIST COOKIES
Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.



