
Related Articles
- Controversial El Quimbo dam risks becoming 'Colombia’s Belo Monte'
- Oil deal 'threatens Ugandan biodiversity'
- Wind turbines: the future of renewable energy or a blight on UK countryside?
- Retrofits: is it possible to make 'greening your home' sexy?
- Spanish mountains under threat from open cast coal mining
Power On - Wind
Jon Hughes and Mark Anslow
1st November, 2007
The UK has been described as the ‘Saudi Arabia’ of wind, with some 50 TWh of onshore and at least 450 TWh of offshore power available every year, well in excess of our current electricity demand.
But wind has recently become the whipping boy of environmental technologies. Turbines are branded as ugly and ineffective, generating energy for only a small proportion of the time, and requiring substantial fossil fuel capacity to provide backup for when the wind doesn’t blow.
The biggest bugbear is known as ‘capacity factor’. This is the percentage figure applied to all power generation technologies, which indicates for what proportion of the year they operate at full, specified output. Onshore wind farms are generally regarded as having a capacity factor somewhere between 30 and 40 per cent, with offshore farms closer to 45 per cent.
Poor reporting in the media has led to this capacity factor figure being interpreted as the amount of time for which wind turbines generate electricity, leading to the popular myth that you only get wind energy for one third of the time. This is quite wrong. Most well-sited wind turbines generate power for 80–85 per cent of the year, but not necessarily at their peak capacity, owing to all sorts of reasons, including weather, maintenance work or mechanical restrictions.
It is worth noting that while the capacity factor for wind farms is between 30...
To view the rest of this article - you must be a paying subscriber and Login
Previous Articles...
Members
ECOLOGIST COOKIES
Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.



