
Related Articles
- Controversial El Quimbo dam risks becoming 'Colombia’s Belo Monte'
- Oil deal 'threatens Ugandan biodiversity'
- Wind turbines: the future of renewable energy or a blight on UK countryside?
- Retrofits: is it possible to make 'greening your home' sexy?
- Spanish mountains under threat from open cast coal mining
Nuclear Power Dossier: Decommissioning
The Ecologist
1st June, 2006
Decommissioning has a ring of finality to it. But don't be fooled. A nuclear reactor will be standing for another 150 years before it is finally razed to the ground
As with permanently disposing of radioactive waste, the UK nuclear industry has never fully disposed of a commercial nuclear reactor. The major problem is that the reactor contains highly radioactive high-level waste that is less easily managed than spent fuel.
It takes three years alone to remove the 60,000 fuel rods that were in the reactor core when it powered its last watt. The sheer volume of the job causes delays, as this ‘high-level’ waste has to cool for at least six months before it can enter interim storage, before being prepared for final disposal.
Simultaneously, work gets underway on removing other high-level waste, known as CRUD – corrosions, residuals and unidentified deposits, or ‘primary hazardous materials’ – from the cooling systems. Again, this is high-level waste that has to be casked and sent for permanent disposal.
Decontamination of the facility follows, where residual radioactive and chemical waste is removed from the fabric of the buildings and equipment by washing, heating, chemical or electrochemical action, and mechanical cleaning. This creates a cocktail of chemical...
To view the rest of this article - you must be a paying subscriber and Login
Previous Articles...
Members
ECOLOGIST COOKIES
Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.



