The Ecologist




 

More articles about
Related Articles

Five steps to developing a community-based energy project

Mary Walsh

17th August, 2010

A practical guide to help would-be community developers turn renewable energy projects into climate change-busting reality

Recent years have seen more and more community-owned energy-generation projects. Expressly supported by the Coalition Agreement and with the arrival of feed-in tariffs, it's looking ever more attractive for local communities to harness their collective energy and become renewable developers.

But just how easy is it to do? How do you turn a local community group into a project developer?

Make no mistake, energy projects are infrastructure developments with multiple moving parts. Not an easy task at the best of times, but even less so for a community group with no track record. It can be done, however. By focusing on a number of key strategic areas, and getting the basics right, there is scope for success.

1. Who are we?

The first key action is to get organised - a good idea and an enthusiastic bunch of people can only go so far. In dealing with third parties, it pays to have a structure. From a practical point of view, having people with defined roles and responsibilities provides efficiencies in how to work and prevents duplication. From a legal point of view, having a vehicle through which the project is managed places project assets and liabilities in one place and protects those involved from personal liability.

In terms of how to structure your project, thinking about the money the project needs and what will happen to the project's profits may help. Will the project be a charity? Will it make a profit? Who will own it? Take advice from local voluntary organisations and from those who have been through the process before.

One additional consequence of formalising a project's structure is the stronger sense of identity it engenders. James Heather, project manager of Ham Hydro CIC, says: 'We had talked about the idea of developing a project on the weir at Teddington for a long time, but when we formed a company we really developed a strong identity and sense of purpose. It helped focus our minds and progress in making our bid to the Environment Agency.'

2. Support from the top

Local authorities and MPs can be key in developing a successful project. Councils have resources which community groups can tap. Get your local councillors and MP on board with the plan - having a vote of confidence from those with sway will bring an added element of strength to the proposal and open up opportunities not normally available to start-ups.

With all political parties now voicing support for community-owned renewable projects, support should be forthcoming. Just don't forget to ask.


3. Getting connected

The number of stakeholders involved in making the project happen can be frightening. First and foremost there is the landowner: is he or she going to be happy with your project? Then there are regulatory bodies, such as the Environment Agency and Local Authorities, contractors and suppliers, interest groups and funders - the list goes on. Getting people on board can be one of the toughest challenges. Project managers can find themselves taking a crash course in diplomacy and negotiation.

When it comes to managing objections, don't expect that a community project will have the support of the whole community - there are many shades of opinion when it comes to environmental issues. One clear example comes from small-scale hydro projects. Local anglers may have a very different view of your plans given their involvement with the river. Engaging at an early stage with people likely to be affected can enhance your project plan. Local knowledge should never be underestimated, and harnessing the experience of the wider community can ease the passage of planning applications and adaptation measures.

As to how to manage this? Don't reinvent the wheel. Others have been through this process and can help you. Simon Rammer of the Ashden Awards, an organisation that has been supporting community projects for the past 10 years, notes: 'One of the key steps to accelerating the process of community developing is connecting new groups with ones who've been through the process before - sharing practical experience is key to moving things along.'

4. Managing the risks

You will need to have arrangements in place that eliminate, mitigate or allocate risks. Be self-aware: it's unlikely you will have all the expertise within your team, so make sure you find it from the best possible providers and seek out people who can help get your project off the ground. You need the right people managing the right stages of the process if everything is to fit into place.

H2oPE, a social enterprise based in West Yorkshire, has a track record in managing the development of community-owned renewable energy projects. Its MD, Steve Welsh, observes: 'There are three major constraints community projects face: lack of time, lack of knowledge and lack of money. We judge the risks and manage them, negotiating supply contracts, engaging stakeholders and raising finance. It can be quite a challenge.'

When negotiating, don't be afraid to ask and don't let your relative size put you off. A key area is getting payment terms that benefit you; deferred payments are one area that can ease cash-flow requirements and help facilitate development opportunities. Don't forget that your suppliers have an interest in your project getting off the ground - leverage your buying power.

5. Getting funded

In the current financial climate this may seem an impossibility, but take heart from the multitude of possible funding options available. From grant funding for early stage development to philanthropic investments, share issues and debt finance, an energy project with strong financials will be able to access funding. Start by speaking to NESTA, the Carbon Trust and the Community Sustainable Energy Programme. Attend events that connect projects with potential investors, run by organisations such as EcoConnect or your local development agency.

Put time and effort into building a financial model showing costs and projected returns. Build in contingency and don't underestimate possible expenditure. Investors will want to see that you've been realistic about costs and that you've made provision for the unexpected.

A number of community projects have successfully raised funds through community share options - a true realisation of community ownership. There is appetite for this kind of investment: people are seeking out ethical investment opportunities, and the arrival of feed-in tariffs for small-scale renewables means consistent returns.

Banks are also now looking seriously at lending to community-based projects, recognising fixed revenue streams and the long-term move towards greening the electricity market. And it makes PR sense for banks to be involved in grassroots developments - remind them of this.

Proving a point

Like it or not, there is still a perception among some bodies that community groups are at best naïve, or at worst incapable. Relieve them of that notion from the offset. Set out a professional offering, a strong structure and an efficient modus operandi and you will set the scene for a successful venture. Be aware of all the various aspects of your project and engage with others from as early a stage as possible.

The future looks local. It's time to get involved.

Mary Walsh is a projects lawyer with a background in renewable energy development. www.colbhaconsulting.com

Add to StumbleUpon
READ MORE...
HOW TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE
Ashden Award Winners: building self-sufficient communities across the UK
The Isle of Eigg Heritage Trust is the 2010 UK Gold Winner of the Ashden Award for Sustainable Energy. Watch and read about how they and five other finalists have made significant cuts to energy use on a community level...
HOW TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE
Communities using hydro power to fund green renewal
A pioneering community-based hydroelectric energy project in the Brecon Beacons is a blueprint for how green energy can provide more than just low-carbon power...
HOW TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE
How to campaign: climate change and energy
From direct action campaigns to eco-village renewable energy systems, there are many ways to learn about and get involved in actions to prevent climate change
HOW TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE
CASE STUDY: setting up a community micro-hydroelectric project
The UK’s first community-funded hydroelectric scheme, Torrs Hydro is generating green energy as well as interest in H2O power. Claire Baylis meets the man behind it
NEWS ANALYSIS
Carbon emissions: the world in 2010
A post-Copenhagen look at where the carbon emissions are coming from and how that is projected to change over the coming decade

 

Previous Articles...

Users Comments

Re: Five steps to developing a community-based energy project
Posted By richardcrimp 1 April 2, 2011 12:41:12 PM

Hydropower at Teddington A response from the Thames Anglers’ Conservancy After recently posting a similar response on Ham Hydro’s Weblog, it no longer appears that the coments facilty is available any further? This after we had been asked by Ham Hydro to set our concerns regarding the proposed project, to which answers were either vague, at best, or simply unanswered? As we rightly advance our collective responsibilities to generate cleaner energies, locally and nationally, it appears that a myth has been born concerning hydropower and its efficacy in producing ‘green’ energy on a local level. At the Thames Anglers’ Conservancy’s request we were recently invited to respond to an initial project brief from Ham Hydro regarding their proposals for Teddington Weir, that being the installation of four Archimedes screws which could possibly generate 1,863,113 kWhs of electricity per annum for the ‘local’ economy. This equates to approximately enough electricity to supply 600 homes, it is said, and would reduce carbon emissions to the tune of 1013 tonnes, costing approximately £2.5mn, which all sounds great, so what’s the problem? Used within the project brief as examples of the energy yield are the award winning Torrs and Settle hydro schemes and neither project has come anywhere near fulfilling the promises made in that regard. Torrs has only produced 52% of its projected energy yield in the first 26 months of its operation, and Settle had produced only 44% in the first 32 weeks (albeit with the rainier seasons to come). All percentages were extrapolated from their own figures taken at the end of November 2010. So what does that mean? It means that those that are investing in such schemes will have to potentially wait twice as long for their investment to produce a ‘profit’ to promote further local carbon initiatives in the future, if ever? It also suggests that the projected yield may be considerably less than proposed and subsequently the carbon savings will also be proportionally lowered to the same degree? Incidentally, the figure of the ‘number of homes’ that hydropower facilitates in project briefers and the like, generally does not include any energy used for heating, which is widely accepted as being over 80% of the total energy use within the average household? Concerning carbon savings in the local area there have been several concerns raised by the Thames Anglers’ Conservancy (TAC). Richmond upon Thames produces 681,000 tonnes of Household & Vehicle Co2 emissions per annum (Energy Saving Trust Green Fleet Review – 2007), and that the nearby Heathrow airport produces around 31mn tonnes pa. The potential saving of 1013 tonnes of carbon emissions, weighed up against the risk of permanently damaging the aquatic environment of the River Thames, seem to be bordering on total insanity! Simply put, the annual carbon savings equate to 34 TV’s being turned ‘fully’ off as opposed to being left on ‘Standby’. Would it not be best to propose carbon savings locally through proven methods of carbon reduction, £2.5mn pounds could go a long way in raising awareness to ensure local people understand how best to use energy within their own homes, and subsequently save them money, as well as ensuring that tens of thousands of tonnes of carbon are never produced in the first place! As usual it appears we are careering head first into making superficial gestures with a nod towards a ‘greener’ way of living through promoting the wide scale use of hydropower, while we continue to avoid the basic principles of developing a sustainable relationship with our environment. For the Thames Anglers’ Conservancy the irreversible risk that hydropower brings to our riverine ecologies is one that defies sound environmental and conservational logic, the cumulative promotion of such projects will irrevocably damage the river’s ecology, “water is a renewable source but a healthy river is not”. Do a little research yourself and I’m sure it won’t be too long before you begin to raise similar concerns yourself, the Thames Anglers’ Conservancy and many other environmental groups certainly are, and it may well be that small scale hydropower is little more than a pig in a poke. Rather than preventing “open dialogue” through your webspace I would have thought that it would have been in Ham Hydro’s best interests to engage with all sections of the community, rather than preventing them from doing so? Richard Crimp Thames Anglers’ Conservancy
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 

Members





Follow the Ecologist