
Photo by Jadwiga Lopata
Related Articles
- Curbing supermarkets' power: will the Groceries Code Adjudicator have the teeth to bite?
- Should Coca Cola be allowed to sponsor the London Olympics?
- ‘We are ready to die for our land’, say pastoralists in Ethiopia’s Lower Omo Valley
- Grave threat of pesticides to bees' billion-pound bonanza is now clear
- Midwifery on screen: how 'One Born Every Minute' gets it wrong
The New Renaissance
Julian Rose
28th July, 2009
When it comes to solving global problems, we need local solutions, change in every area of life and a 'people's movement' for self-governance...
To survive, 'big enterprise' must dissolve into units composed of many smaller parts
'We want massive investment in large scale wind and tidal energy. Can you help us?' reads a quarter page advertisement from the UK Green Party, published in the Centre for Alternative Technology's summertime edition of Clean Slate magazine.
'No, we can't help you' would be my immediate reply. Something is definitely wrong here: 'massive investment' and 'large scale' are a far cry from a real solution to our critical planetary malaise. Indeed, 'massive' investment is arguably exactly what got us into so much trouble over past decades of 'throwing money at the problem' in attempting to conjure solutions to seemingly intractable problems.
Small is Beautiful
'Small is Beautiful' may not impress the current Green Party, however the party's origins are closely identified with Fritz Schumacher's deeply influential writing and work. And quite rightly so.
Pivotal to Schumacher's central thesis is the observation of 'appropriate scale' in the design of all technologies, their output and their ownership. An observation which extended also to building and architectural design. He famously once stated that no building should be built taller than the tallest tree in the immediate vicinity. An argument based on the insight that when things get 'too big' they not only become inhuman - but eventually implode upon themselves. This basic law of physics applies equally to green technologies as to fossil fuel models. To survive, 'big enterprise' must dissolve into units composed of many smaller parts - and this shrinkage is exactly what we should now be focussing on.
Fritz Schumacher spoke of the need for 'appropriate technologies' having a strongly human feel to them: fun, diverse, adaptable, easy to build (using local materials) and affordable.
It is my intention to emphasise the absolute validity and timeliness of these ideas. The urgent need to counteract the effects of fossil fuel driven pollution of our seas, rivers, atmosphere and soils, coupled to the challenges presented by post peak oil and climatic destabilisation, demand truly radical innovation of both 'thinking and doing' as many of us are surely aware.
But such innovation is not about replicating the centralised distribution patterns of vast, conventional, corporate-sponsored power grids. Pumping green energy into these edifices and then thinking that the job is done - is no more of a solution than selling organic food through hyper and supermarket chains. Neither can be claimed as any answer to the socio-economic, ecological and cultural disintegration that results from pandering to our consumer obsessed society. In fact such approaches do more to contribute to the problem than to solving it.
As long as we remain in servitude to an energy model constructed around maintaining the demands of an over-stimulated consumerist mind set, the message of Small is Beautiful will go unheard.
A new Renaissance
Right now, we are presented with a once in a lifetime chance - I would prefer to say 'imperative' - to disengage from the entire top-down power-obsessed pyramid that holds our world to ransom, and to turn things on their head: we need a people led 'Renaissance' that builds a 'new democracy' even while the old one thinks its still in charge!
A Renaissance of bottom-up entrepreneurship; locally inspired and executed. A 'taking back' of responsible powers of self-governance by those who do it best: ourselves. Powers that have been calculatedly stolen from honest working people by an unholy alliance of global financier clout and political connivance - which shows no signs of abating.
The emerging pulse of the 21st century is throwing up an increasingly stark choice: A New Renaissance of humanitarian self realisation and cooperation.. or .. a continuing slide into an Orwellian 'Bland New World' in which civil liberties, humanistic expression and spiritual aspiration are ever more confined, policed and overseen by governments held to ransom by their corporate masters. A world where genetically modified foods and eugenics inspired laboratory babies usurp the laws and call of nature.
Readers of The Ecologist, including myself, know which of these futures they are seeking to build.
But do we know how to do it?
Power to the people
I have endeavoured to lay out the essential bones of 'how we can do it' in a recently published book entitled Changing Course for Life - Local Solutions to Global Problems. In it, I take us on a swift journey though the historical background to the crisis currently facing all realms of our society and then offer clearly outlined steps for how we can engage in building a new renaissance in agriculture, education, economics, science, art, health, the law; as well as in socio-political and spiritual arenas, urban greening .. and beyond. On the book's internet site I suggest 'a plan' for the formation of a 'people's movement' to take back power in the regions.
The reason for covering such a wide field is because the rot has penetrated so far into the ailing trunk of our western civilisation that only root and branch reform of all areas affected can bring about a true transformation. And I believe it is a true transformation that we - and our beautiful polluted planet - are really longing for, not a half way house.
It is a process of both inward and outward transformation, simultaneously set in motion and steadily manifest. The process is already under-way. We just need the courage, conviction and compassion to keep going and to unify our disparate green shoots into an unstoppable critical mass that will sweep aside the old regimes and set us - and our planet - on the new course which is our true destiny.
Julian Rose is a farmer, writer, holistic thinker, broadcaster and activist
Changing Course for Life: Local Solutions to Global Problems by Julian Rose (New European Publications, £10) is out now. To buy a copy click here
www.changingcourseforlife.info
Previous Articles...
Users Comments
Re: The New RenaissanceJulian is spot on in advocating a renaissance, led by people themselves.
By getting together, working together, trading together, and supporting each other, and by being enterprising in the true sense of the word that we can do it. Starting with each of us who do care creating the change for ourselves.
There are millions who care now and even more importantly his book which I have read shows how all of us can start with ourselves and create a new world.
Julian has created himself and an has lived an integral life, he has been creating sustainable life, food and farming practically since 1975.
Is he England's Wendell Berry? An advocate who farms and writes brilliantly..for sure.
The following paragraph from a review of Changing Course for life sums it up...
"this book goes beyond merely pointing out how and where we have gone wrong. His clear objective is identifying a new way of living our lives. This encompasses a very personalised and spiritual consideration of the ends to which we devote our daily thoughts and energies.
He acknowledges the need to realign our energies with the natural rhythms of the earth rather than directing them daily into the current model of degradation of our natural state of being. But he also discusses society at large, considering the necessary changes to our politico-economic environment, to agriculture, education, and greening our city lives.
This book is, quite literally, bursting forth with ideas: ideas for change, ideas for how we can move forward into the next phase of consciousness, away from a mechanistic view of us in relation to the universe and the landscape, to a mindset that embraces the concept of living as a holistic integrated whole."
Read it and think!
| |
Re: The New RenaissanceIn the future people will loook to people like Julian who has been harried and worse yet has not only able to logically explain his position but also has done it. A man of action and letters -
A Wendel Berry for the UK | |
Re: The New RenaissanceLarge scale power plants that produce energy from wind or other RES are for sure green and have a positive impact on environment and reduction of emission of CO2. But is the real reason behind the massive investment related to the fact that we suddenly want to be better to the environment or rather we want to have clear conscience to use more and more energy (it is greener and greener so why not, one could think)? Is the whole problem really only about this how we produce electricity or also how we use it? And what about other problems related to energy supply? The large blackouts as well as problems with gas supply from Russia we've had for the last couple of years have shown many weak sides of centralized energy generation and distribution. Someone should put up the question if we want to keep this weak elements of our energy supply system when making large scale investments in energy sources of the 21st century.
Quite the opposite - we have the roots from which the renewable energy industry is coming. In the very beginning it was all about small scale, local, decentralized green energy supply systems. Individual for each home or village at largest,with no big and expensive distribution systems, centrally controlled and owned by big energy giants. Sustainable, built into local landscape, meeting actual energy needs of a house or society. Stable and secure sources of energy. If something goes wrong with one system it does not affect half of the country... | |
Re: The New RenaissanceAs with everything in the UK, Renewable Energy is being kept firmly in the hands of big business.
Wind and solar, just for starters, give the opportunity for local and community ownership schemes. The ISP model, Industrial and Provident Society, is considered the best ownership vehicle.
I have calculated that for as little as a £1000-2000 investment, a typical UK household could receive all its electricity needs from wind power. This in theory could provide virtually free or very cheap electricity for the life cycle of the wind turbine - expected to be 20-25 years.
Back up electricity supply is supplied by the same buying and selling schemes already in use by the major electricity suppliers.
The electricity is supplied to the householder/business via the existing grid networks.
An umbrella IPS for many hundreds or thousands of smaller ones, if that is the way it was to be structured, could handle this aspect as well as the buying/installing/negotiating expertise.
It baffles me why hardly anyone is doing this.
It would take power away from the giant energy corporations and provide it cheaply and under local control. I bet most planning objections would melt away too.
Twenty seven paper paper on subject available. |


