- Will putting a price on nature put environmentalists out of a job?
- With all eyes on BP, others are busy drilling deep elsewhere...
- Stop the big pubcos taxing our local pubs out of existence
- The Government has found a backhanded way to subsidise nuclear power
- We're all responsible for BP's oil spill disaster
- Bond markets, not politicians, control our future
- I'd rather vote Labour, but the Tory manifesto is worth a look
- I've picked 5 good firms; 5 bad. Who will do best?
- Having both emissions trading and feed-in tariffs is a waste of time
Are Nike, Starbucks and Walmart our best hope against climate change?
2nd March, 2010
Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer... well, enemies who are making some pretty bold pledges, at any rate
One favourite trick of the greens and the left is to beat up on governments for giving trade subsidies to big business. It’s an easy hit, and everybody likes to get one in.
Greenpeace recently railed against new Canadian legislation that would 'effectively subsidise nuclear operators'; George Monbiot has described such payments to British airlines as 'unwarranted, outrageous, disgraceful'; and the Ecologist has a proud history of turning up our nose at these 'outrageous subsidies'.
Subsidies take many forms – tax breaks, incentive payments, limits on how much companies will pay if anything goes wrong – but the argument is usually the same: that governments are hypocrites for preaching the gospel of the free market, when trade subsidies that favour one industry over another help ensure the market is anything but free.
But I can sense a wind of change. If you care about sorting out global warming, you might have to accept that unfair trade subsidies are your new best friends. Here’s a few examples from the past few weeks:
- Britain needs to upgrade its power distribution network to a ‘smart grid’ to have a chance of hitting our carbon emission reduction targets. A report on how to build this from the Parliamentary Select Committee on Energy and Climate Change is littered with talk of 'strategic investment' and 'incentives' to convince companies to do the heavy lifting involved.
- Mitsubishi is to spend £100m on offshore wind turbine research in Britain, creating a few hundred jobs and kick-starting a renewable energy industry with bags of potential – but only after Westminster saw fit to throw £30m of Government grants the company’s way.
- Clipper Windpower is building a factory in north-east England to make blades for the ‘Britannia Project’, a prototype offshore wind turbine that will be among the biggest in the world – but only after the Government chucked it £4.5m last year.
- Engineering giant Siemens signalled a massive vote of confidence in UK tidal power by investing millions in Bristol-based Marine Current Turbines – after the Government quango The Carbon Trust gave MCT a £2.7m grant earlier this month.
The list goes on, via the Government’s boiler scrappage scheme, home insulation grants and new plans to save you £5000 if you buy an electric car. None of these things constitute free trade: all of them are straightforward market-distorting subsidies. But the reality is that it’s a deeply unfair, unbalanced market out there – and so we may well need more of the same.
Thank you Nike, Starbucks and Walmart
I’ve been reading the Book of Revelations trying to make sense of some strange new portents, but have had no luck yet (frankly, it’s completely bonkers). All I can say with certainty is that the world is turning – can it really be the case that our best hopes now lie with Nike and Starbucks?
These corporate giants have just launched a massive, coast-to-coast campaign to drum up support for new US climate change legislation, which is floundering.
Stranger still, Walmart - the world’s biggest retailer and joint top of the list of companies environmentalists love to hate, along with … erm, Nike and Starbucks – has announced it will cut 20 million tonnes of carbon emissions from its operations. OK, it looks like it will be Walmart’s suppliers, not the store itself that makes the cuts, but 20m is still a lot (equivalent to taking 3.8m cars off the road for a year, the company claims).
It’s unlikely to just be some new PR campaign – after all, fewer Americans believe global warming is happening today than did two years ago – so could this unholy trinity be doing it because they believe it? What the hell is going on?
Copenhagen failed. So should we tax carbon at the border?
The lack of agreement at Copenhagen has left some thinking that the only way to protect national economies is to tax imports from nations who don't pay a carbon price...
RBS labelled ‘dirtiest bank in Britain’
Pressure groups take Treasury to court for second time in a year over failure to assess the environmental and human rights impact of RBS
Climate deniers and Friends of the Earth are both wrong
Denying the science of climate change is ill-informed, but then so is misreading a report to claim that the entire carbon market is flawed...
Competition is corroding our communities and self-esteem
An obsession with celebrity is costing us more than our free time - it has led to a culture in which individual endeavour is the only form of success
Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.