President Nasheed meets the press after the Worlds first ever underwater cabinet meeting held at Girifushi island, 17th October 2009 - intended to draw attention to the island state's existential threat from climate change and rising seas. Photo: Mauroof Khaleel / Presidency Maldives via Flickr (CC BY-NC).
#JeSuisNasheed - standing with the green 'Mandela of the Maldives'
Anders Henriksen & Lykke Friis
16th April 2015
After restoring democracy to the Maldives in 2008 President Nasheed became a world leader on climate change. But four years later the old regime deposed him in a coup, and now he has been imprisoned for 13 years on bogus 'terrorism' charges. Now we must stand with Nasheed - by starving the island state of its tourism revenues.
The charismatic new leader gained fame for his remarkable efforts to persuade the world to combat climate change, which threatens low-lying Maldives. But it did not take long for the old regime to move against the young democratic government.
This year has been anything but tranquil in paradise. In March, after a prolonged period of tension in the Maldives - the Indian Ocean island nation better known as a honeymoon paradise - a panel of judges found the former president, Mohamed Nasheed, guilty of terrorism and sentenced him to 13 years imprisonment.
The international community has condemned Nasheed's trial as a farce. The charges against him were highly dubious, he was denied the right to legal counsel, given just a few days to prepare his defence - and two of the presiding judges even testified on behalf of the prosecution. Amnesty International labelled the trial as "a travesty of justice".
As numerous UN reports have shown, the Maldivian judiciary is highly corrupt. It is a judiciary that is loyal not to the rule of law, but to the regime that has been in charge since a coup d'état in 2012.
Nasheed is now back in the same jail where he spent years as a prisoner of conscience during the former Maldives dictatorship.
At the end of 2008, when democracy swept aside 30 years of dictatorship, it all looked so promising. The Maldivian people chose Nasheed as president in their first democratic elections and, for a brief moment, freedom blossomed.
During Nasheed's presidency, Maldivians could speak freely for the first time, enjoy new found political freedoms, and express themselves through art and culture.
Internationally, the charismatic new leader gained fame for his remarkable efforts to persuade the world to combat climate change, which threatens low-lying Maldives. Nasheed toured the world as a political rock-star, receiving accolades from the White House to Windsor Castle.
But it did not take long for the old regime to move against the young democratic government. On February 7 2012, Nasheed was forced to resign and the presidency was handed to Mohamed Waheed, a puppet of the former regime.
The Maldives soon reverted to type: journalists were targeted, protesters beaten up, and opposition politicians threatened and murdered.
The subsequent presidential elections 2013 were marred by widespread allegations of vote-rigging. The former dictator's half brother, Abdulla Yameen, won - despite an overwhelming expectation that Nasheed would be returned.
Nasheed's incarceration should be cause for concern to anyone who cares about democracy, liberty or the rights of women. In the Maldives, the moderate, freedom-oriented version of Islam that Nasheed espoused is under threat from a regime that colludes with Islamic extremists.
Unless the current trajectory is turned, the liberal forces in the countries will lose the on-going battle with fundamentalist Islam.
In the last year alone, Islamic State supporters have rallied in the streets of Male, the Maldivian capital, and a growing number of Maldivians - some with experience of terrorist training camps in Pakistan - have gone to Syria to fight for Islamic State.
Only Nasheed and his Maldivian Democratic Party have been willing to tackle the growing problems of Islamic radicalism.
There are few statesmen of Nasheed's stature. Many foreign journalists, with good reason, refer to him as the 'Mandela of the Maldives'. In the interests of democracy and stability, the international community must take a clear stand.
Targetted sanctions on Maldives' rulers
Unless Nasheed is swiftly released from prison, the European Union and other nations should impose targeted sanctions against those in power.
These sanctions should include travel bans and foreign asset freezes. The sanctions should target President Yameen, his cabinet ministers, including the minister of tourism, and the corrupt judges who imprisoned Nasheed, and members of the security forces responsible for attacks on peaceful protesters.
Furthermore, since the survival of the regime depends on the annual arrival of the more than a million foreign tourists, individual countries should also supplement sanctions with a tourism boycott. Just like potential tourists should think twice before spending their money on the atolls.
Yameen's regime is baring its teeth. It is time for the international community to respond in kind.
Anders Henriksen is Associate Professor of Public International Law at the University of Copenhagen.
Lykke Friis is Prorector for Education at the University of Copenhagen.
Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.