The Ecologist

 
Donnachadh McCarthy shortly before his arrest on Parliament Square at an Occupy Democarcy rally on 22nd October 2014. Photo: from the mobile phone of Donnachadh McCarthy.
Donnachadh McCarthy shortly before his arrest on Parliament Square at an Occupy Democarcy rally on 22nd October 2014. Photo: from the mobile phone of Donnachadh McCarthy.
More articles about
Related Articles

OccupyDemocracy suppressed - is Cameron any better than Putin?

Julian Sayarer

23rd October 2014

Donnachadh McCarthy, The Ecologist's correspondent at Occupy Democracy was arrested yesterday when police cleared Parliament Square of protesters. The brutal repression of peaceful protest puts Britain in the same moral camp as China, Russia and others whose human rights record we publicly despise, writes Julian Sayarer.

Why has the desire to improve one's society been made a negative thing, as if only the preserve of malcontents and sticklers, where it might reasonably be the most dignified of causes?

The people camping outside Parliament under constant police harassment deserve more than our indifference.

OccupyDemocracy, whose occupation survived for seven of the planned nine-days on the Parliament Square grass, and continues now on pavements, is certainly a movement with limitations.

The majority of these limitations are enforced: the ruling that anything which could constitute a 'structure' in Parliament Square ensures the space is physically limited to almost nothing aside from people and a few belongings.

The blue tarpaulins that have now become a motif of the movement are now forbidden. Donnachadh McCarthy was arrested for the dubious crime of having a tarpaulin in his possession at 10.30 am - neatly folded under his arm.

There is a limitation of human numbers, though this - slowly but bravely - is changing for the better, and it is a tragedy of any self-respecting political order that this limitation of people is fostered by a deliberately aggressive policing strategy.

Police violence is a powerful dissuader

Quite simply, and wholly unsurprisingly, people are reluctant to protest where assembling in the name of democratic rights, reduced corporate influence and a fairer society leaves you open to the likelihood of being hit by a police baton, or being prevented from sheltering under a plastic sheet while protesting the direction your democracy is heading.

Loyal to the true meaning of the term, this situation is all the more tragic precisely because it is avoidable, and no MP inside the Parliament opposite could remain unconcerned at their own diminished legitimacy, the lack of confidence in their order, when it is deemed appropriate to manage very reasonable and entirely peaceful protest in such a way.

We can only hope ministers will be struck that fencing off the seat of a democracy in order to prohibit protest is a statement that clouds the moral high ground claimed when addressing global problems ranging from Vladimir Putin to ISIS.

Were he to venture across the road the Tory MP Zac Goldsmith would find much support for his dogged battle for a proper recall bill so that voters might have greater powers to remove MPs failing in duties to their constituents.

UKIP's first MP, Douglas Carswell, with loyalty seemingly closer to his own statesmanly values than his new party, would find support for ideas of elected primaries to stop the universally-hated scourge of career politicians parachuted in to safe seats.

Jenny Jones and Russell Brand - the noble exceptions

There would, no doubt, be much support on offer for the projects of many politicians should they get past the combination of a media blackout and the fundamental human failing to assume that people who dress, speak and look very differently to us will unlikely share the same goals and vision.

It is an enormous tragedy that - with the noble exception of Green peer, Jenny Jones - a stand-up comic might be amongst the public figures most eager to associate with and advance the case for the protesters.

With Russell Brand's Twitter following in excess of 8 million, and OccupyDemocracy working hard to maintain numbers in the hundreds, the question of whether Brand is a meaningful political voice or only an internet meme might finally have been answered in favour of the former.

For sure, some of OccupyDemocracy's limitations are self-inflicted, though as much is forgivable where the protesters are to be forced into sleep-deprivation and drubbings by the weather.

The camp goes through the same motions of its much larger forebear from St Paul's in 2011, though with only a fraction of its resources or people.

There are talks and workshops, scarcely audible because sound-amplifying equipment is also banned, and valiant efforts at discussing the TTIP or NHS privatisation overlook that such is likely a task beyond the reach of the small gathering assembled in the square.

Where are the millions of supporters?

Doubtless something must be done to pass the hours in a sense of purpose, but it leaves almost unmentioned elephants in the room: why don't more people share the protesters' values, why won't the many millions who do share them join in such a protest, why is such police brutality committed and tolerated and if this is the lie of the campaigning land - how will future protests respond more successfully to it?

And yet it is always easier to analyse than to do; indeed a growing vogue for political dissection will scrutinise an order vociferously while satisfied to leave it intact, allowing the braver spirits of OccupyDemocracy to maintain the tradition about which they are content to converse.

We can only dream that the smallest percentage of those many thousands who've passed into the Disobedient Objects exhibition, inside the safe walls of the Victoria & Albert Museum, might have felt spurred to visit an actual protest for the betterment of their own society.

Similarly silent have been the media, and perhaps they are tactically biding time or maybe waiting to judge whether this has any bandwagon potential at all.

Regardless the reasons, many who earn their living from peddling the ideals of Change seem steadfastly unmoved that a predominantly very young group of people are prepared to stay overnight, with only a tarpaulin for protection, outside Parliament on bleak nights in late autumn.

The protesters, apparently undeterred by the lukewarm reception outside the camp, begin to adopt and own the symbolism of the tarpaulin and this Tarpaulin Revolution - hoping to make popular currency of as much, but at the same time having their struggle reduced to its smallest concession and the most trivial elements of visual currency. In so doing, the protesters dance to the tune of the very master that ignores them anyway.

A simple and courageous spirit

You cannot visit a protest of this sort without being moved by the simple and courageous spirit on show, and those who attend the camp will no doubt leave with countless positive lessons, experiences and relationships to take from it.

Moreover, that the camp held as long as it did -in the face of gross harassment - is a huge success of which the protesters can be enormously proud, preserving a right and a tradition for the next gathering who will come to claim it.

After the events at Parliament Square have passed, it will be wider society and those who disregard, ignore or remain entirely unaware of OccupyDemocracy who will stay stuck in a malaise far more depressing.

Even from this there are valuable questions that can, where asked, inform positive change. If ideals and idealism have at root been responsible for every liberty we might now take for granted, then why has idealism become so unfashionable, almost to a point of embarrassment?

Why has the desire to improve one's society been made a negative thing, as if only the preserve of malcontents and sticklers, where it might reasonably be the most dignified of causes?

 


 

Julian Sayarer writes at this is not for charity. The site and blog arose from his 2009 world record for a circumnavigation of the globe by bicycle, a protest against the corporatisation of sport and human endeavour. You can buy his account of the adventure, 'Life Cycles', locally on Hive.

This article was originally published by Open Democracy under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 licence.

Creative Commons License

 

Previous Articles...

Work for The Ecologist as a Contributing Editor

ECOLOGIST COOKIES

Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.

More information here...

 

FOLLOW
THE ECOLOGIST

 

Help us keep the Ecologist platform going

Since 2012, the Ecologist has been owned and published by a small UK-based charity called the Resurgence Trust. We work hard to support the kind of independent journalism and comment that we know Ecologist readers enjoy but we need your help to keep going. We do all this on a very small budget with a very small editorial team and so joining the Trust or making a donation will show us you value our work and support the platform which is currently offered as a free service.

Join The Resurgence TrustDonate to support the Resurgence Trust