The Ecologist

 
The tranquil beauty of Lofoten could be threatened with the prospect of off-shore drilling. Photo: Sören Schaper via Flickr (CC BY-ND).
The tranquil beauty of Lofoten could be threatened with the prospect of off-shore drilling. Photo: Sören Schaper via Flickr (CC BY-ND).
More articles about
Related Articles
  • ‘Stockfish’ – unsalted cod, dried in the open – is a Lofoten tradition. Photo: Harvey Barrison via Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0)
    ‘Stockfish’ – unsalted cod, dried in the open – is a Lofoten tradition. Photo: Harvey Barrison via Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Why Norway may open up its spectacular Lofoten archipelago to oil and gas firms

Joseph Dutton, University of Exeter

12th February 2016

The Lofoten peninsula Norway’s Arctic North is not just stunningly beautiful. It's also home to the world’s largest deep water coral reef and full of wildlife. So why is the government saying it will have to be opened up to the oil and gas industry? Never mind the country's warm words on environment and climate change, writes Joseph Dutton. It's fossil fuels that rule the roost.

For all the big talk about fighting climate change, the basic truth remains: future production of oil and gas is central to the Norwegian economy, while the EU will still want a secure supply of these fossil fuels - especially gas.

At the start of each year, Norway hands out new licences for offshore oil and gas development. Typically, these 'Awards in Predefined Areas' (APA) receive little coverage outside of the specialist media.

But this year was more controversial, after the country's energy minister argued that the environmentally-sensitive Lofoten islands "must at some point come into play".

Lofoten is a unique and stunning archipelago in Norway's far north, where huge unspoilt mountains rise out of the ocean. Located at the end of the Gulf Stream, it's unusually mild for somewhere beyond the Arctic circle.

Large coral reefs found to the west of the islands mean that the region's cod-filled waters are protected by domestic laws and international conventions.

Despite the energy minister's comments, no licences were actually offered immediately next to Lofoten - this time. And those that were offered in the region were all further from Lofoten than the closest existing one, which is around 70km from the south-west edge of the islands and is operated by state-owned Statoil, who are yet to start drilling.

Nonetheless even the prospect of future development was enough to worry environmental groups, and has led some to question the country's commitment to addressing climate change despite the 2015 Paris Agreement.

Why Lofoten?

The collapse in oil prices over the past two years has delayed or cancelled many expensive new projects around the world. Lofoten has emerged as a cheap alternative as the islands are close to the mainland and the surrounding waters are relatively shallow.

Drilling in the area was prohibited under Norway's 2006 management plan for sustainable use of the Barents and Norwegian seas. But the resources are hard to ignore - there are an estimated 1.3 billion barrels of oil in Lofoten and neighbouring Vesteralen and Senja. (By comparison, the UK's entire resources are estimated to be up to 21 billion barrels.)

In 2013, Norway's Labour prime minister Jens Stoletenberg supported an impact assessment study on development in the area, but following the election that year the new Conservative-led coalition agreed not to drill in these areas, around the protected island of Jan Mayen, or in the so-called High Arctic region.

With the Conservatives still in power, opening up Lofoten would represent a backtrack. Yet it's not just Lofoten. This year's round of exploration licenses was also notable for the number offered in the Norwegian Sea, 24 out of a total 56, with 27 in the North Sea and five in the Barents Sea.

This is the highest number since the current system was introduced. It highlights the financial difficulties facing oil and gas companies, but also suggests a change in the geography of Norwegian oil and gas development.

Environment or economy?

The next wave of exploration work was long expected to take place in the Barents Sea, off Norway's northern coast. However the lack of previous infrastructure to build on and some disappointing reports of smaller than expected oil discoveries means the economics there are challenging. This was an issue back when oil prices were riding high, and the drop since then has further dimmed the prospects of developing the Barents.

Norway is also concerned about the future of gas demand in Europe. What's the point of setting up drilling rigs and pipelines in the Arctic if no one wants to buy it? Gas has been caught up in the EU's drive to reduce its dependence on Russian energy, and difficulties with the EU emissions trading scheme have so far stymied hopes that it could be the bridging fuel to a predominantly renewable future.

In May 2015 Norway's parliament asked the country's US$857 billion sovereign wealth fund, Norges Banke, to divest from coal power - a move applauded by climate activists. But less than a year later this latest round of new oil and gas developments has drawn criticism from those who claim opening up new fields will undermine Norway's commitment to tackling climate change, just weeks after the Paris deal.

Even though development at Lofoten is unlikely in the near future, the minister's comments on opening the area up at some point could be reflective of a wider trend across the world.

For all the big talk about fighting climate change, the basic truth remains: future production of oil and gas is central to the Norwegian economy, while the EU will still want a secure supply of these fossil fuels - especially gas.

 


 

Joseph Dutton is an associate research fellow at the University of Exeter’s Energy Policy Group.The Conversation

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

 

Previous Articles...

ECOLOGIST COOKIES

Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.

More information here...

 

FOLLOW
THE ECOLOGIST