
Related Articles
- The Ecologist July 1980: Our broken healthcare system
- The Ecologist June 1980: Tidal barrages: boon or blight?
- The Ecologist April 1980: Nuclear power – the grand illusion
- The Ecologist March 1980: The enviromental cost of pesticides
- The Ecologist January 1980: A proposal to save the world’s tropical rain forests
- The Ecologist November 1979: Nuclear power is still dependent on cheap fossil fuels
The Ecologist December 1979: Can we control pollution?
Edward Goldsmith
December, 1979
Thirty years ago Edward Goldsmith’s article ‘Can we control pollution?’ wondered what happens to pollution once we have ‘disposed’ of it
Are we actually in control of our pollution?
What happens to it once it is out of site? Can we predict how it will behave in the environment and with other pollutants? And is it enough to let it be diluted in by atmosphere?
From radioactive waste to oil, SO2 and CO2, Goldsmith explores what happens to these pollutants once we have finished with them:
‘…"recent investigations have indicated that the 'greenhouse effect' of CO2 is further enhanced by other man-made trace gases, such as the halocarbons (freons) with an atmospheric residence time of forty to seventy years and N2O (from fertilisers), as well as CH4 [methane] and NH3". Even if the further use of freons is prohibited, Flohn assures us that "the combined warming effect of these gases will nevertheless reach about fifty per cent of the CO2 alone. Due to residence-time of the infra-red absorbing gases and their fairly rapid mixing, they will soon take the leadership in the anthropogenic impacts on climate on a global scale...’
To read the original article in our archive,
click here
Previous Articles...
Members
ECOLOGIST COOKIES
Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.



