The Ecologist


Clearance of areas of mapped tiger habitat in Riau, Sumatra (Photo: Greenpeace 2010)


More articles about
Related Articles

Greenpeace hits back at 'notorious forest destroyer' Asia Pulp and Paper


23rd February, 2011

Campaigners urge retailers to follow example of Tesco and Adidas in cutting links with the controversial paper and packaging supplier after latest allegations of greenwashing

One of the world's largest paper and packaging suppliers has been accused by Greenpeace of mounting a 'shameless' drive to greenwash its image.

In a comment piece in the Ecologist last month, Asian Pulp and Paper (APP) said activists were wrong to target the company and that it wanted all of its wood supplies to come from sustainable plantations by 2015. At present around 85 per cent comes from its own plantations, which are replanted every six or seven years.

The company also said it supported the two-year ban on the granting of any new rights to convert natural forests or peatlands into plantations.

However, Greenpeace forest campaigner Ian Duff, writing in the Ecologist, said the company had not made clear that the shortfall in wood supplies would continue to come from rainforests until 2015.

'It is timber that comes from deforestation in Sumatra, from areas including those mapped as deep peat areas and habitat for species such as the Sumatran tiger. This is exactly the sort of destruction that APP claimed it is not responsible for,' he said.

Greenpeace also said the company's claims of supporting tiger conservation work at a sanctuary in the province of Sumatra needed to be set against its continued clearance of tiger habitats. 'So let’s be absolutely clear. APP is practising business as usual, its operations are not sustainable and it’s trying to cover its tracks by throwing money at a handful of small projects to distract attention from its operations,' said Duff.

Duff said APP should follow the example of its palm oil sister company Golden Agri-resources, which was exposed for attempting to 'greenwash' its image before recently committing to stop expansion into natural forest habitats.

'The answer to APP’s troubles lies not in PR spin but in implementing sustainability policies which rule out continued natural forest clearance. Impossible you say? Not so - APP’s sister palm oil company last week publicly announced new policies to stop expansion into forest areas. If these policies are implemented it is a huge step forward, one that APP urgently needs to learn from,' he said.

Useful links
Greenpeace Indonesian forest campaign

Add to StumbleUpon
Asia Pulp and Paper: why activists are wrong over destructive logging allegations
The paper giant has been accused by Greenpeace of destructive logging and green-washing. But campaigners are mistaken, says APP boss Aida Greenbury - the company is supporting REDD projects and putting sustainability at the centre of operations
Logging company accused of ‘misleading public’ with carbon conservation project
Controversial Indonesian company Asia Pulp & Paper has come under fire from environmentalists because of 'false claims' over Sumatran rainforest carbon reserve
Norway accused of 'hypocrisy' over ethical investment
The Norwegian government has sold its investment in one Malaysian logging and palm oil company but remains a big shareholder in another accused of destroying rainforest and orang-utan habitats
Palm oil giant Sinar Mas admits breaking law by clearing peatland
Indonesia's largest palm oil and pulp company started clearing land for palm oil plantations before it had received permits or made conservation assessments
Palm oil giant accused of rainforest destruction caught ‘red-handed’
Indonesia’s largest palm oil and pulp group, Sinar Mas, is continuing to destroy rainforests and peatland despite promises to end the practice


Previous Articles...


Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.

More information here...




Help us keep the Ecologist platform going

Since 2012, the Ecologist has been owned and published by a small UK-based charity called the Resurgence Trust. We work hard to support the kind of independent journalism and comment that we know Ecologist readers enjoy but we need your help to keep going. We do all this on a very small budget with a very small editorial team and so joining the Trust or making a donation will show us you value our work and support the platform which is currently offered as a free service.

Join The Resurgence TrustDonate to support the Resurgence Trust