The Ecologist

Bluefin tuna

Campaigners say the future of bluefin tuna - here being loaded - is now uncertain. Photo: OCEANA / Pepe Ceballos

More articles about
Related Articles

Bluefin tuna condemned to extinction by 'laughable' ICCAT summit claim activists

Kara Moses

30th November, 2010

Campaigners unite in fury over the failure of the latest attempt to curtail overfishing of the critically endangered bluefin tuna species

Environmental groups have slammed the decision made at the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) meeting in Paris to reduce annual eastern bluefin tuna catch quotas by a ‘laughable’ four per cent, a reduction which they say will not allow the species to recover from overexploitation.

At talks held last week commission delegates from 48 fishing nations approved a 2011 eastern bluefin fishing quota of 12,900 tonnes – down only 600 tonnes from last year – which will mean previously agreed targets for recovery will be missed.

Scientists’ precautionary recommendations of 6,000 tonnes per year were made but ignored. Researchers predict these new measures have only a 70% chance of enabling the species to recover to healthy population levels.

The decision has attracted fierce criticism from campaign groups who have labelled the meeting a ‘massive failure.’

Bluefin tuna is one of the most overexploited species of fish, and is currently listed as critically endangered on the IUCN Red List following population declines of 80 per cent in the last forty years.

Green groups say the commission has succumbed to pressure from the fishing industry and questioned their priorities. ‘Greed and mismanagement have taken priority over sustainability and common sense at this ICCAT meeting when it comes to Atlantic bluefin,’ said Dr Sergi Tudela, Head of WWF Mediterranean’s Fisheries Programme.

‘After years of observing ICCAT and countless opportunities to do the right thing, it is clear to us that the commission’s interests lie not in the sustainable harvesting of bluefin tuna but in pandering to short-term business interests.’

Greenpeace said the word ‘conservation’ should be removed from ICCAT’s name. ‘Governments here have just agreed to a bluefin fishing plan that scientists conclude has a shocking one-third chance of failing to protect the species,’ said Greenpeace International oceans campaigner Oliver Knowles. ‘The Mediterranean bluefin fishery should have been closed here at this meeting. This is a monumental failure of the way governments are supposed to protect our oceans.’

There was also anger over the commission’s failure to even discuss the possibility of no-fishing areas in bluefin spawning grounds in the Mediterranean which conservationists have been pressing for in a bid to help prevent further population declines.

Add to StumbleUpon
Why the failure of the bluefin tuna summit is bad for people and the environment
The ICCAT summit on bluefin tuna was stained by a lack of transparency, allegations of illegality and disturbing examples of financial interests trampling over environmental concerns, says James Thornton

Campaigning against pirate fishing
Illegally caught 'dirty' fish threatens local fishermen, consumer health and the future of the world's fisheries. The EJF's Pirate Fishing Campaign is tackling the problem head on
How pirate fishing fuels human exodus from Africa to Europe
Illegal fishing to feed European demand for seafood is devastating coastal communities in The Gambia and across West Africa - forcing many people to leave their homeland and make a perilous and sometimes deadly voyage to Europe
Mediterranean Massacre
Seeing bluefin tuna gaffed is like watching a thoroughbred racehorse being hacked to death with an axe.
Greenpeace whaling activists get one-year jail sentence
Greenpeace has condemned as 'disproportionate and unjust' a one-year jail term, suspended for three years, handed down on two Greenpeace activists who exposed widespread corruption in the Japanese government's whaling programme


Previous Articles...

Work for The Ecologist as a Contributing Editor


Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.

More information here...




Help us keep the Ecologist platform going

Since 2012, the Ecologist has been owned and published by a small UK-based charity called the Resurgence Trust. We work hard to support the kind of independent journalism and comment that we know Ecologist readers enjoy but we need your help to keep going. We do all this on a very small budget with a very small editorial team and so joining the Trust or making a donation will show us you value our work and support the platform which is currently offered as a free service.

Join The Resurgence TrustDonate to support the Resurgence Trust