
The US Department of Justice has vowed to pursue BP and its contractors to pay for the full cost of the clean-up for the oil spill
Related Articles
- This week's changes to the Ecologist.org
- Climate change 'will wreak havoc on Britain's coastline by 2050'
- Huhne accused of 'hypocrisy' for promoting offshore oil in Scotland and Arctic
- Tanzania urged to accept World Bank funding of alternative Serengeti highway route
- UK's 'fracking' gas-extraction is not unconventional says industry
BP criminal action will not safeguard against oil spills, say campaigners
Ecologist
3rd June, 2010
Sanctions and legal action against BP unlikely to prevent further oil spill, say environmental groups that argue the US needs to cut its ties with oil industry
Oil giant BP is facing a criminal investigation into allegations that it broke laws in the lead up to the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico
It was already facing millions of dollars in compensation payments and clean-up costs after admitting 'full responsibilty' for the spill, in which more than 20 million gallons of oil have so far been released.
The US Justice Department will look at whether BP broke various environmental regulations on protecting habitats, water and wildlife against pollution.
Not the solution
However, environmental groups both within the US and abroad argue that any criminal case against BP is not the solution. The Sierra Club said the disaster was a 'wake up call' to government to act against the oil industry.
'We need to stop letting the oil industry call the shots and standing in the way of policies that would promote clean energy and safe, healthy jobs instead of more aggressive and dangerous forms of oil. It's time to move beyond oil,' said executive director Michael Brune.
Greenpeace agreed and said the US could not 'drill its way' to energy independence or security through offshore drilling projects. It said oil lobbyists should not be allowed to block moves towards cleaner forms of energy.
'As long as we continue to let oil companies like BP and Shell bully politicians, write our energy laws and bribe regulators, we will remain addicted to their dirty and dangerous fossil fuels.
'President Obama should cut the polluter lobbyists out of the debate so we can finally move toward a clean energy revolution that is good for the country, not just for corporations,' said oceans campaign director John Hocevar
Useful links
Full details of criminal investigation being brought by US Justice Department
| READ MORE... | |
![]() |
NEWS ANALYSIS BP oil spill: can environmental crime ever be made to pay? Million dollar fines and compensation claims may dent the profits of BP and other companies admitting responsibility for ecological disasters but, on their own, are they enough of a deterrent? |
![]() |
COMMENT MMS - the three initials behind the BP Deepwater Horizon oil disaster BP is in trouble. Big trouble. But others are to blame for the ongoing oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico, and the US Mineral Management Service is at the top of the list... |
![]() |
COMMENT We're all responsible for BP's oil spill disaster Filled up your car recently? Bought new bike tyres? Popped any pills? Then you're in part responsible for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill... |
![]() |
NEWS VIDEO: why tar sands activists took on BP A report from BP's recent AGM where activists fought to raise awareness of the oil giant's investment in tar sands - includes an interview with George Poitras, member of Mikisew Cree indigenous First Nation |
Previous Articles...
Users Comments
bp oil spillIt is sad and sick to see how many people on Gulf of Mexico got affected, but money wont solve all their problem in during the tough times. My friend sent me an email that if you would like to claim for compensation the best place is oil spill claim center http://bit.ly/8Xj11D please forward this to your friends and family who may need this.
| |
Re: BP criminal action will not safeguard against oil spills, say campaignersIt is true that the western world is too heavily dependent on oil and other fossil fuels. But we can not do without them altogether (for example computers need plastics derived from oil). So what we need to do is conserve these valuable resources and legislate to minimise environmental impacts (such as emissions and accidents).
The legislation needs to be wide-ranging and carry penalties that ensure every effort is taken to comply (at present it can pay to cut corners).
Conservation can only be achieved by taxing the extraction of fossil fuels heavily so that sustainable alternatives become more attractive in the market place. Such taxes are justifiable as a means of paying the general public for extracting a resource that belongs to us all, not the extractors. The revenue can then be used to compensate those who would otherwise suffer from higher fuel prices (for example with higher pensions and welfare payments). |






