
Links between using a mobile phone and increased risk of developing brain tumours are 'inconclusive'
Related Articles
- This week's changes to the Ecologist.org
- Climate change 'will wreak havoc on Britain's coastline by 2050'
- Huhne accused of 'hypocrisy' for promoting offshore oil in Scotland and Arctic
- Tanzania urged to accept World Bank funding of alternative Serengeti highway route
- UK's 'fracking' gas-extraction is not unconventional says industry
Uncertainity over mobile phone and brain cancer links
Ecologist
18th May, 2010
Largest study to date finds increased tumour risk for heavy mobile phone users but says 'biases and errors' make use of these findings impossible
Researchers have failed to find a conclusive link between mobile phone usage and increased brain tumour risk.
Although there is, as yet, no known biological mechanism by which mobile phones could cause cancer, an international study was set up in 2000 to look into the links.
The Interphone study, the largest of its kind, covered almost 13,000 people across 13 countries and compared frequency of exposure and mobile phone use of people with four types of brain tumours - tumours of the brain (glioma and meningioma) and of the acoustic nerve (schwannoma) and partotid gland - against healthy volunteers.
Suggested links
According to the study there were 'suggestions' of an increased risk of glioma and meningioma in heavy phone users. However, the study authors concluded these findings were 'biased' because some users reported improbable levels of use of 12 or more hours a day, and 'limited' by the study's methodology, because people with brain tumours were more likely to overestimate the role of a potential risk factor.
'The balance of evidence from this study, and in the previously existing scientific literature, does not suggest a causal link between mobile phone use and risk of brain tumours,' said Professor Anthony Swerdlow, from the Institute of Cancer Research.
Professor Swerdlow did admit that mobile phone use had increased since the start of the study period and that they had no information on the use of mobile phones for longer than 15 years. But he pointed out that radiation emissions were, on average, lower from more modern handsets.
Criticism
The report was criticised for failing to look at the risks of using hands-free devices and keeping a phone close to the body for long periods, such as in a pocket or by the bed at night. However, Professor Patricia McKinney, from Leeds University and another one of the participating scientists, said radiation from a phone in a pocket or by the bed was 'very low'.
The study also failed to look separately at children despite a recent Swedish study showing that children and teenagers using mobile phones were at an increased risk of developing a brain tumour.
However, Professor McKinney said it was wrong to 'jump on the results of single studies', and that most of the literature that have made claims about risks had not been replicated.
'Although [the study's findings are] inconclusive there is still an important message that if there had been a larger risk then this study would have found it,' concluded Professor McKinney.
Earlier this month, acknowledging the gap of evidence on mobile phone use and children, a new five-year study MobiKids was launched to investigate the risk of brain tumours amongst young people.
Useful links
Interphone study findings
MobiKids study
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)
| READ MORE... | |
![]() |
INVESTIGATION Mobile phones and health: what do we know? Yanar Alkayat takes a timely look at what we know for certain about mobile phones and health |
![]() |
NEWS French want to ban mobile phones in schools Mobile phones could soon be banned in junior schools in France, under plans put forward by French senators |
![]() |
NEWS Mobile phone safe radiation guide published US agency publishes radiation ranking for top brands including Motorola, Blackberry and Apple iPhone |
Previous Articles...
Users Comments
Re: Uncertainity over mobile phone and brain cancer linksSo basically what we are saying here is that 15000 people were used to conduct a poorly built study, the outcome of which by very definition was bound to be inconclusive. Bad Science at its worst. A total waste of time and resources, it would be interesting to see who paid for all this...Vodafone, orange,?????
Any scientist worth his salt should check the workings of studies BEFORE accumulating a pile of data that means nothing. I refer you to Ben Goldacres book Bad Science.
And still the Scientific community insists that we are safe in thier hands and mere lay folk should keep out of scientific debate that is far too complex for us mere mortals to comprehend.
The phrase "Oxygen Bandits"springs to mind. | |
Re: Uncertainity over mobile phone and brain cancer linksSorry almost 13000 | |
Re: Uncertainity over mobile phone and brain cancer linksThere's one fact that needs to be borne in mind here more than anything else: if you subject the human body (or any other living organism) to stresses it did NOT evolve to deal with, you've got a potential problem. Unfortunately, with all this wireless technology we probably won't know what that problem is for decades yet.
| |
Mobile phone use causes cancerhttp://vimeo.com/8109152
Lloyd Morgan, B.Sc., lead author of the landmark report, "Cellphones and Brain Tumors: 15 Reasons for Concern", discusses the flaws in the Interphone study that render it unreliable as a gauge of risk of brain tumors from cell phones.
The 11 design flaws grossly understimate the risk, and even still, the Interphone study, just pubished in the International Journal of Epidemiology, still shows statistically significant increased risk of brain tumors after 10 years of cellphone use. This is ominous because toxicants often take decades to show tumor risks, and we are seeing it at just 10 years. Cell phone usage rates in the Interphone study were just a fraction of cell phone usage rates today among adults and children alike.
Finally, without explanation, results were not pubished for acoustic neuromas and salivary gland tumors which are the tumors closest to the ear against which one places the cell phone.
http://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/internation...
International EMF Collaborative Technical Analysis on Interphone Brain
Tumor Study
Why are the results from the Swedish team led by Dr. Lennart Hardell so very different than the Interphone Study?
A Swedish team led by Dr. Lennart Hardell has published results showing substantial risk of brain tumors from cellphone and cordless phone use.
These results are internally consistent to what would be expected, if cellphone are a risk of brain tumors. That is:
The higher the cumulative hours of wireless phone use, the higher the risk;
The higher the number of years since first wireless phone use, the higher the risk;
The higher the radiated power from cellphone use, the higher the risk;
The higher the exposure (use on the same side of head as the brain tumor), the higher the risk, and;
The younger the user at first use of wireless phones, the higher the risk.
Why does this Swedish team consistently find increased risk from brain tumor from cellphone use when the Interphone study does not find similar risk?
The answer is quite simple, the Swedish team does not have the two largest contributors to the systemic-protective-skew found in the Interphone Study: selection bias and treating cordless phone use as a non-exposure.
This Swedish team had an 89% participation rates of cases and controls, while the Interphone study had 77% and 63% participation of meningioma and
glioma cases respectively, and 39% participation of controls.
The Swedish team treated cordless phone use as an exposure, and the Interphone study treated cordless phone use as a non- exposure. (clearly ridiculous since it is an almost identical exposure) | |
Funding of studies on mobile phones and brain tumoursThe Interphone brain tumour studies were largely funded by the mobile phone industry.
Media reporting is controlled by the powers that be.
In the UK this includes the Monsanto funded Science Media Centre that is also sponsored by the Mobile Operators Association and WIFI alliance.
The press conference was held there on Monday 17th May.
The press stories on Tuesday resulting from that conference are of the 'no risk' type.
| |
Re: Uncertainity over mobile phone and brain cancer linksI see no problem with the mobile phone industry taking an interest in this study (by providing funding). How many other industries do the same? From the actual paper: 'This work was supported by funding from the
European Fifth Framework Program, ‘Quality of Life
and Management of Living Resources’ (contract 100
QLK4-CT-1999901563) and the International Union
against Cancer (UICC). The UICC received funds
for this purpose from the Mobile Manufacturers’
Forum and GSM Association. Provision of funds
to the INTERPHONE study investigators via the 105
UICC was governed by agreements that guaranteed
INTERPHONE’s complete scientific independence.
The terms of these agreements are publicly
14 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
available at http://www.iarc.fr/en/research-groups/
RAD/RCAd.html.' I see no bias here. By the way I read the paper and see no bad science at all, a big collaborative scientific effort. The fact that the results are inconclusive does not mean the risk is not there, the risk of developing a brain tumour is extremely rare in all cases and is not very well understood. Its far better than strapping a phone onto a mouse and coming to the conclusion that increased exposure increases the risk. That would be bad science! |




