The Ecologist

 
Gas pipeline route
Planned route [in green] of the gas pipeline across the Baltic Sea (Image: Nord Stream AG)
More articles about
Related Articles

Gas pipeline through contaminated Baltic given go-ahead

Ecologist

19th February, 2010

Environmental groups in Germany, Finland and Denmark claim gas pipeline will devastate the Baltic Sea's already fragile marine ecosystem

Three legal challenges are being brought against the construction of a major undersea gas pipeline between Russia and Germany.

The €7.4 billion Nord Stream project, heavily promoted in recent weeks by Russian prime minister Vladmir Putin, has now been approved by all the Baltic countries throug whose territorial waters the pipeline will pass.

Construction is expected to start as early as April this year.

Legal action


However, campaign groups in three of the countries that have approved the pipeline are attempting to delay construction, claiming environmental impacts have not been properly assessed. 

Separate cases being brought in Germany by WWF, in Finland by the Estonian Fund for Nature (ELF) and in Denmark by the Estonian Naturalists Society (ENS), all allege the permits for the project should not have been issued by the national authorities. 

Jüri-Ott Salm, CEO of the Estonian Fund for Nature, said they were concerned about the toxic sediment that would be released by the construction of the pipe and clearing of munitions dumped in the Sea.

He said alternative routes overland had not been properly considered and that ELF wanted a new environmental assessment made.

Munitions dump


Ivar Puura from the Estonian Naturalists Society, said its case was specifically about munitions dumps in Danish and Swedish waters - which it claims have not been properly assessed.

'If Nord Stream AG [the consortium building the pipeline] is concerned on the environmental safety, it should take time to finish the incomplete assessments of environmental impacts.

'The appeal is seeking the delay in construction and communicates the warning of scientists that there are too many open questions on known risks and uncertanties, that should be answered before the works are launched. Otherwise, the risks to human health and ecosystem services are too high,' said Puura.

A spokesperson from Nord Stream said €100 million of environmental surveys had been undertaken and that any complaints were directed against the national authorities rather than them.

'So far we are not aware of any details that could lead to a delay.  We are looking forward to a timely start to work in April.'

Useful links
 
Nord Stream
Estonian Fund for Nature (ELF)
Estonian Naturalists Society (ENS)

Add to StumbleUpon
READ MORE...
NEWS ANALYSIS
How the legal system is preventing environmental justice
Individuals and local campaign groups are being prevented from challenging environmental damage because of the potentially crippling cost of legal action
NEWS
Biodiversity 'invisible' in current economic model
The steady loss of forests, soils, wetlands, fisheries, species and coral reefs around the world is closely tied to the lack of value we put on nature, says three-year study
NEWS
Marine mammals under threat from ocean noise pollution
Oceans becoming noisier as sounds travel further in increasingly acidic water
INVESTIGATION
How can we have fish tomorrow? Ask the past
Dismissed initially as a good storyteller but nothing more, environmental historian Poul Holm has mapped the history of marine animals in such detail that it is having profound impacts on our current understanding of the oceans
BLOG
From Latvia with love...
Whilst worrying about the footprint of his ferry, Ewan gets an Eastern-bloc geography lesson, and is told some uncomfortable home truths about rainy old Blighty...

 

Previous Articles...

ECOLOGIST COOKIES

Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.

More information here...

 

FOLLOW
THE ECOLOGIST