Poor countries will suffer most from any delay to an agreement to reduce emissions
EU must 'step-in' to save Copenhagen from disaster
16th November, 2009
Postponing an agreement on cutting emissions will delay key decisions on providing funding to less industrialised countries for adaption and mitigation, including tackling deforestation
Plans to delay a legally binding agreement on tackling climate change until next year have been heavily criticised by environmental campaigners.
The US has supported proposals put forward by Denmark, which is due to host the climate summit next month in Copenhagen, for a political agreement on greenhouse gas emissions and a deadline for agreeing a legally-binding one in the future.
Greenpeace said any delay would hit vulnerable countries hardest and called on EU leaders to continue to push for an agreement at Copenhagen climate summit next month.
'When Obama started downplaying the Copenhagen outcomes, did he check with the world’s most vulnerable countries as to whether their survival was now negotiable,' asked Greenpeace International Climate Policy Advisor, Kaisa Kosonen.
'That’s certainly not the message we have heard – climate change impacts are already affecting millions across the developing world and they need action now. This is not about time but rather the absence of political will from industrialised countries, which are refusing to take their fair share of the global efforts, and instead continue to postpone important decisions into eternity.
'EU leaders, including Merkel, Sarkozy and Brown, must immediately step in and publicly oppose this back down from a legally binding climate agreement in Copenhagen,' said Kosonen.
Campaigners reject Copenhagen deal fears
Campaigners have rejected claims that December’s Copenhagen climate summit cannot produce a legally binding climate deal, and called on the EU to stand up to US negativity
Lester Brown: 'We shouldn't count on Copenhagen to save us'
Lester Brown, founder of the Earth Policy Institute and the WorldWatch Institute, on his fears for Copenhagen, genetically modified food and the failure of the media
Conmen are already selling dodgy forest carbon
Fancy some forest carbon, guv'nor? Only one careful owner... Dan Box explains why a cautious approach to deforestation schemes would be wise
Impact of religions will have 'deeper roots' than Copenhagen
Archbishop speaks of the lasting impact of a religious movement to tackle climate change ahead of major summit of religious leaders
Nothing will happen at Copenhagen until the 11½ hour
Copenhagen was always going to be a nail-biting experience, but if we abandon Kyoto and try to reinvent the wheel you might end up gnawing your fingers off too
Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.