The Ecologist

News web pic 2_196.jpg
More articles about
Related Articles

Government pulls plug on local renewables policy


24th August, 2007

Environmental groups and local authorities are dismayed by Government plans to drop a key local policy to promote renewable energy, following pressure from developers.

A Department for Communities and Local Government draft planning policy statement leaked earlier this week contains plans to scrap the so-called ‘Merton rule’, a local authority planning policy requiring developer to equip a new building with technologies allowing it to obtain at least 10 per cent of its energy requirement from renewable sources, such as solar power.

The renewable energy industry views the Merton Rule, which is named after the London Borough of Merton which first established it, as key to promoting a low carbon economy in the UK. The Merton rule has been adopted or is in the process of being adopted by 150 local authorities.

Environmental groups believe the Government, which was previously in favour of the rule, has caved into intense lobbying pressure from the Home Builders Federation and British Property Federation, whose members don’t want to face the added cost of meeting the requirements of the rule.
The Government proposals would tie local authorities’ hands by restricting the Merton Rule to specific sites agreed years in advance of development.

Central Government has a poor record on promoting renewables – its low carbon buildings programme has repeatedly run out of money to provide grants, and it has given up on meeting EU targets for adopting renewables.

Supporters of the Merton rule claim that without it, initiatives such as the solar thermal project being installed in the old Arsenal stadium in Highbury, London, the largest of its kind in the world, would not have happened.

Andrew Warren, chairman of the Sustainable Energy Partnership, told the Guardian: ‘We'd expect ministers to be embracing the Merton rule ... not falling for the current developer campaign of misrepresentation and skullduggery.’

This article first appeared in the Ecologist August 2007


Previous Articles...


Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.

More information here...




Help us keep the Ecologist platform going

Since 2012, the Ecologist has been owned and published by a small UK-based charity called the Resurgence Trust. We work hard to support the kind of independent journalism and comment that we know Ecologist readers enjoy but we need your help to keep going. We do all this on a very small budget with a very small editorial team and so joining the Trust or making a donation will show us you value our work and support the platform which is currently offered as a free service.

Join The Resurgence TrustDonate to support the Resurgence Trust