The Ecologist

 

UK Prime Minister Theresa May cites a “need for wildlife management to protect vulnerable animals” - views which are out of step with recent conservation science proving the lack of efficacy of such attempts at predator control
More articles about
Related Articles

Ecologist Exclusive: Theresa May's views on fox hunting lack scientific validity

Iain McGill & Colleagues

5th June, 2017

Theresa May's suggestion that she was going to allow a free vote in Parliament on repealing the Hunting Act met with howls of outrage , not least from vets concerned about animal welfare. Dr Iain McGill (who spoke at the recent Keep the Ban protest) and his colleagues write here about her ignorance on hunting and, given the Kimblewick hounds issue, the danger posed by making hunting legal again.

If death by hunting with hounds really were humane, the few remaining veterinarians who support hunting could offer that as a euthanasia option for the humane destruction of their clients' pets, which of course they do not...

Theresa May recently reconfirmed her support for fox hunting1 and previously expounded her arguments in a 2015 letter2, demonstrating a profound misunderstanding of the welfare and disease risks involved. She states that "hunting with hounds results in almost instantaneous death", without any supporting evidence, although the Burns report3 concluded that hunting with hounds has "serious welfare implications" for quarry animals such as foxes, deer, hares and mink. Pathological examinations of wildlife killed illegally by hunts, show injuries consistent with prolonged suffering4.

She cites a "need for wildlife management to protect vulnerable animals"2, views which are out of step with recent conservation science proving the lack of efficacy of such attempts at predator control5 6 and demonstrating that hounds are not a suitable method for dealing with diseased wild animals. Since the introduction of the Hunting Act, fox populations across the UK have remained roughly stable7. While foxes do take some livestock, they do not have a significant impact on farming incomes8, obviating the need for human interference.

She cites support from "over 500 Members of the RCVS" although no such list has been published. Indeed, if death by hunting with hounds really were humane, the few remaining veterinarians who support hunting could offer that as a euthanasia option for the humane destruction of their clients' pets, which of course they do not.

The running of hounds over extensive areas of farmland has biosecurity implications for the control of diseases, particularly that of bovine TB9, recently discovered in the Kimblewick Hunt's hounds10, with potential implications for the health of domestic animals and people over six home counties 11.

Hunting with hounds was stopped during the Foot and Mouth Disease outbreak of 2001. A reinstatement of the biohazard presented by hunting with hounds would be totally inappropriate given the government's failed badger culling and TB policies, which have resulted in epidemic spread of bovine TB in cattle to new areas of the country previously unaffected by the disease12. In April there was a new cattle herd TB breakdown near Theresa May's own Maidenhead constituency, which also falls within the Kimblewick hunting range, at Henley-on-Thames12.

The Government's promised Disease Risk Assessment of the Kimblewick hound outbreak, and results from disease investigations both locally and nationally in hounds, need to be made public before the General Election. Theresa May has made hunting with hounds an election issue, but her arguments are evidence light, prejudice heavy, and take no account of the disease risks. Her support is based on ignorance of the scientific facts and the objective cruelty involved. Such a lack of empathy casts grave doubt on the suitability of Mrs May to negotiate animal welfare and protection policies under Brexit.

We urge voters to ask Theresa May to explain the reasons she is supporting such a regressive and high-risk policy as a return to hunting with hounds.

Dr Iain McGill BSc (Hons) BVetMed MRCVS. Director, Prion Interest Group, Director VATC, Lead author VVNABC

Dr Mark Jones BVSc MSc (Stir) MSc (UL) MRCVS

Professor Andrew Knight MANZCVS DipECAWBM (AWSEL) DACAW PhD MRCVS SFHEA. Director, Centre for Animal Welfare, University of Winchester, European & RCVS Veterinary Specialist in Animal Welfare Science, Ethics and Law; American Veterinary Specialist in Animal Welfare

 

Dr Andre Menache BSc (Hons) BVSc DipECAWBM (AWSEL) MRCVS. European & RCVS Veterinary Specialist in Animal Welfare Science, Ethics and Law

References

1.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2017-39861011

2. Letter by Theresa May to a constituent, explaining her views on hunting with hounds. (2015) Vets & Vet Nurses Against The Badger Cull

3. Committee of Inquiry into Hunting with Dogs in England & Wales

4.Wildlife killed by illegal hunts show injuries consistent with prolonged suffering

5. Treves, A., Krofel M. & McManus, J. (2016) Predator Control should not be a shot in the dark. Frontiers in Ecology and The Environment 14, 7, 380-388.

6. Rushton, S.P., Shirley, M.D.F., Macdonald, D.W. & Reynolds, J.C. (2006). Effects of culling fox

populations at the landscape scale: A spatially explicit population modelling approach. The

Journal of Wildlife Management, 70: 1102-1110.

7. Since the introduction of the Hunting Act fox populations have remained roughly stable

8. McDonald, R., Baker, P. & Harris, S. (1997). Is the fox a pest? Electra Publishing, Cheddar,

Somerset.

9. Jahns, J. J. Callanan, M. C. McElroy, D. J. Sammin, H. F. Bassett (2011) Post-mortem Findings in Irish Culled Hounds. J. Comp. Path, Vol. 145, 59-67.

10. Foxhounds euthanised after becoming infected with bovine TB

11. McGill, I, Abraham M, Boscolo S, Eastwood B., et al (2017 in press) Veterinary professionals oppose any return to hunting mammals with hounds (The Veterinary Times, June 5th 2017)

12. http://www.ibtb.co.uk

 

 

This letter, released today, coincides with the publications of an article by this author and some 20 of his colleagues in the Veterinary Times (see ref. 11 above) and was offered exclusively to the Ecologist for online publication today

 

 

 

 

 

Previous Articles...

ECOLOGIST COOKIES

Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.

More information here...

 

FOLLOW
THE ECOLOGIST

 

Help us keep the Ecologist platform going

Since 2012, the Ecologist has been owned and published by a small UK-based charity called the Resurgence Trust. We work hard to support the kind of independent journalism and comment that we know Ecologist readers enjoy but we need your help to keep going. We do all this on a very small budget with a very small editorial team and so joining the Trust or making a donation will show us you value our work and support the platform which is currently offered as a free service.

Join The Resurgence TrustDonate to support the Resurgence Trust