- Institutes from around the world are making deposits to the Svalbard Global Seed Vault
- Organic farmers are not anti-science - we leave that to the genetic engineers
- Climate Negotiations: tackling the big questions before COP22
- The problem is not glyphosate, or DDT, or BPA - we must challenge the entire system!
Direct action group 'London Rising Tide' on carbon off-setting
22nd February, 2007
On Wednesday 22nd February, activists from the group London Rising Tide occupied the offices of the Carbon Neutral Company. Below are their grievances...
As the report ‘The Carbon Neutral Myth – Offset Indulgences for your Climate Sins’ recently published by Carbon Trade Watch has shown:
• Offset companies are selling a “peace of mind” to consumers where none should exist. This breeds complacency.
• Some of the most polluting companies (and politicians) are using offsets as a cheap form of greenwash - a distraction from their inherently unsustainable practices and a refusal to take more serious action on climate change.
• Creative accountancy and dubious scientific methodologies are often used to inflate profit margins.
• Our knowledge of the carbon cycle is so limited that it is impossible to say whether tree plantations even have a net positive benefit in terms of mitigating climate change, let alone exactly quantifying this supposed benefit into a saleable commodity.
• It is impossible to determine the baseline of what would have happened if the project had not taken place that would enable calculations of how many credits could be generated.
• Projects that look great on the website or in the leaflet are often, in practice, mismanaged, ineffective or detrimental to the local communities who have to endure them.
• The media and certain celebrities have been complicit in promoting an analysis of climate change that puts all the focus on individual lifestyles and draws attention from the wider, systemic changes that need to be made in our societies and economies.
The act of commodification at the heart of offset schemes assigns a financial value to people’s desire to act on climate action, and neatly transforms this potential into another market transaction.
There is then no urgent need for people to question the underlying social and economic structures that brought about climate change in the first place - one has just to click and pay the assigned price to get 'experts' to take action on your behalf.
Not only is it ineffective and based on half-baked ‘guessing games’ and dubious science, it is also very disempowering for the participants.
Kevin Smith, London Rising Tide
For more information, visit http://www.londonrisingtide.org.uk/
This article first appeared in the Ecologist February 2007
Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.