The Ecologist

Manbasia - a displaced Forest dweller, Jharia. Photo: Sarah Stirk.

Manbasia - a displaced Forest dweller, Jharia. Photo: Sarah Stirk.

More articles about
Related Articles

In the New India, 'development' is armed robbery

Graham Peebles

10th February 2014

India is in the grips of a state-backed corporate war against the environment, the poor and indigenous peoples, writes Graham Peebles. The new rulers avert their gaze as their countrymen, doused in poverty, burn on the party pyre.

The Adivasi are inconvenient, irrelevant gaggle, that need to be cleared away or put to work collecting scraps of coal.

There are many fires raging in India; the agrarian crisis is one of the most shocking and destructive and sits at the heart of a range of interconnected calamities.

"Don't detach this crisis from the overall political, economic social direction of the country" advises P. Sainath.

It is a crisis rooted in one fundamental cause - the "predatory commercialization of the countryside", a destructive development model that includes huge infrastructure projects.

Among these are vast dam building projects - 3,600 dams have been built since independence making India the third biggest dam builder in the world after China and America.

Then there is the gifting of large tracts of land to corporations - for industrial arteries known as ‘Special Economic Zones' (SEZs), and for massive mining projects.

A corporate playground

It is a collection of corporate sports which together are causing "the biggest displacement in Indian history", an epidemic of farmer suicides, the death of ancient cultures, and ecological mayhem.

It is also a redundant model of civilization that has fuelled a spectrum of resistance movements - from the non-violent Gandhians in the homespun corner, to the armed wing of the Maoists (or Naxalites) in AK47 combat boots, the more militant, members of which want nothing less than the dismantling of the Indian state.

As Kishanji, Maoist leader, said in the film 'Adivasi Caught Between two Fires' (ACBTF, link to Youtube, 23 minutes), "We are the opposition in the true sense. All the political parties are the same in all the states. We want to destroy the state. This is a real war."

Hidden war

The fiercest fire sparked by the commercialization of the countryside has to be the war tearing through parts of the north-eastern and central states.

The insurgency, or "corporate war" as Arundhati Roy calls it, covers "over 40% of India's land area, encompassing 20 of the country's 28 states, including 223 districts (up from 55 in 2003) out of a total of 640", according to the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).

And yet it remains largely hidden from the world - and the new city dwelling middle class we hear so much about.

The priorities of modern India

India may not be choosing to feed its 450 million plus starving citizens or provide sanitation and health care to the rural poor and metropolitan slum dwellers, or even toilets to 50% of the population who defecate in the open.

But it comes tenth in worldwide military expenditure, has the third largest standing army in the world and, Om Shanti, India is a nuclear armed state.

The battlefields for the 40-year internal conflict are the mineral rich afforested areas in some of the country's poorest regions - where some of the poorest people on earth live.


In order of intensity the states affected, (or "infested" as the Indian media describes it), are: Chattisgarh/Jharkhand, West Bengal, Maharashtra, Orissa, Bihar, and Andhra Pradesh.

These regions comprise the so-called "Red Corridor" (which covers over 1,000 km), government slang for the most poor, backward and underdeveloped parts of the country.

It is here that paramilitary forces, police and army are pitted against Maoist / Naxalite insurgents (numbering around 20,000 armed fighters with 50,000 supporters), made up largely of India's indigenous people - the Adivasis (from adi meaning from the earliest times), a marginalised minority accounting for around 8% (or 85 million) of the population.

Purification Hunt

In addition to paramilitary troops, reports Global Issues (GI), "the state has also used death squads known as Salwa Judum (SJ), [set up in 2005] meaning Purification Hunt, to spread a reign of terror and drive out Adivasis from villages for the benefit of companies - and on a massive scale."

The vigilante group, which contained Adivasi in its ranks, was banned in Chattisgarh by the Supreme Court in 2011. But the damage done was immense, as GI reports:

"displacing 300,000 Adivasis, killing, raping, and looting them and burning down their villages. Five hundred charges of murder, 103 of arson, and 99 of rape have been levelled by citizens against the Salwa Judum, but the Chattisgarh government has not investigated or processed a single case. According to Human Rights Watch."

In May 2013 in an attack by Maoists in Chattisgarh that killed 28 Congress Party leaders, Mahendra Karma the founder of the Salwa Judum "was stabbed 78 times and shot 15 times".

Adivasis - an embarrassment

The Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh has called the Maoist insurgency "India's greatest internal security threat".

Such hyperbole is designed to deflect attention from the true cause of instability: extreme inequality and social injustice, feeding crippling levels of poverty.

The conflict is a "governance issue that has broken into a law-and-order issue", revealing the flaws in the "way India is governed", writes Sudeep Chakravarti, author of Red Sun: Travels In Naxalite Country.

Along with the Dalit community (15% or 190 million people) the Adivasis have been excluded totally from 20 years of economic growth.

They are seen by the government and the ruling elite in the cities as an embarrassment, an unsightly hangover from the past to be swept aside, allowed to fester and die in rural poverty or urban degradation.

Infant mortality amongst Adivasis (or Scheduled Tribes - of which there are 635 distinct groups) is 57% and child malnutrition is 73%. Note that the national average is the highest in the world at 48%, according to the International Institute for Population Sciences.

Resistance is the only solution

Ignored, many in desperation turn to the Maoists for support. Some Adivasi groups have formed their own resistance movements.

in Orissa for example, several tribes came together forming the Chasi Mulia Sangh, a tribal land movement (unconnected to the Maoists they assert) 5,000 strong.

Armed with traditional weapons they are fighting for human rights and collective tribal ownership of their ancestral lands. They "claim they are caught between the two fires of an escalating Maoists / Naxalite insurgency and the governments paramilitary backlash", ACBTF tells us.

Such movements face injustice and violent repression from security forces, which serve to push these groups into the arms of the Maoists. Once people are associated with 'India's greatest security threat', "armed police are sent in, and village land is forcibly taken over with impunity", reports anthropologist Felix Padel.

Toiling sons of India's sacred soil

The Adivasi people have "an ingrained regard for truth and law", they have lived in harmony with the land for generations: within their culture the natural environment is sacred and belongs to the whole community - there is no concept of individual ownership.

They are ‘the sons of the soil' condemned to live in grinding poverty outside the economic growth bubble by a government that is firmly wedded to the corporations and sees the shining future of India in post-modern industrialized (meaning market capitalist) colours.

Corruption is endemic within all sectors of Indian politics, the police and, it is said the judiciary, and although large sums of money are 'officially' "being spent on tribal groups, only 1% or 2% reaches them, 98% is swindled, siphoned off", states Professor Manmath Kundu.

The government "has done nothing for us, no development, no roads, no drinking water, no schools". And we could add - no healthcare. Rural India is deprived the constitutional right to a universal health care system.

Where is the improvement for the poor?

After 20 years of economic development India has of course progressed - it now produces a food surplus compared to a deficit in 1950, but most of its people have seen little improvement in their lives.

On the contrary, there are more poor than ever and the poor are poorer. As Arundhati Roy states, "the price that is being paid for development - for growth, is displacement, deaths, environmental destruction."

The government has given nothing to its most vulnerable citizens, and taken everything. "Thousands of Adivasi farmers have had their land stolen", says Chasi Mulia Sangh leader, Nachika Linga.

When land is culture

And with the land goes the culture, including language and traditions. The Adivasi in Dr. Kundu's view, "have a very bleak future, because the development is not 'tribal friendly' and means 'de-tribalisation... ultimately there will be hardly any tribal groups left in the true sense."

Angered by such government neglect and extreme levels of social injustice the Maoists are fighting against a political-economic system that - despite constitutional guarantees - ignores the 800 million oppressed and downtrodden.

They describe their fight as a "democratic revolution, which would remain directed against imperialism, feudalism, and comprador bureaucratic capitalism."

Bulldozing the rural poor

Corrupt and heavily armed the 'imperialist' security forces are acting on behalf of corporate India, Western multinational corporations and governments - a self-interested posse motivated by one thing only - profit.

They are determined to loot the land of the vast mineral resources (particularly iron ore and bauxite), inflate their burgeoning multi-national coffers and fulfil the Indian corporate-governments vision of a post-modern industrialised nation, sprinting to the winning line in the race for global economic supremacy.

"The Tata's and the Ambani's are using armed might. I think everything that happened in Latin America and Central America with the creation of Contras, the arming of society, dividing of society, is being tried in India", says environmental activist Vandana Shiva.

As Mira Kamdar argues, the Indian state "has been thoroughly corrupted by neoliberalism both at the national and provincial levels", and in partnership with corporate India is at war with some of the oldest, poorest people in the world.

These are people who find themselves "in the way of the kind of development - rapid industrialization fuelled by the exploitation of natural resources", being pursued by the government.

The displaced millions

A World Bank / IMF model of development that is causing extreme hardship for the majority of Indians, and has displaced millions of indigenous people: as many as 56 million people have been displaced by dam building alone since 1947.

According to the 1894 Land Acquisition Act the government is not bound to compensate displaced people with anything other than a cash payment - little use to an illiterate Adivasi man - women get nothing at all, who has just lost his home, his livelihood and his cultural heritage.

This is feeding an insurgency which has taken tens of thousands of lives. A media-managed conflict in which paramilitary forces have herded large numbers of forest dwellers off their ancestral land into police camps, or forced to migrate to cities where they join the millions living sub-human lives in the slums.

A colonial war on the villages

A war, according to Felix Padel, is "the worst war there has ever been in India, because it is directed against village people."

And yet, throughout the world, the majority "don't know there is a civil war going on in India", so great is the corporate state's control over the 'free press' - and the international community's indifference to tribal people who are unlikely to be particularly heavy shoppers.

The violent pattern of mining, environmental destruction, death and displacement of native peoples is an ancient story.

It is a colonial epic, the story of the powerful versus the vulnerable, corporations versus indigenous people, who happen to live on ancestral land rich in mineral deposits worth US$ trillions. 

From their exalted point of privilege, writes Arundhati Roy, the rulers of India, the upper and middle classes, "look down on the land and ask [of the Adivasi people] 'what's our bauxite doing in your mountains, what's our water doing in your rivers, what's our timber doing in your forests?"

Far from understanding the delicate ecological balance all is seen as a profitable commodity. Deep within the Saranda forest in the state of Jharkhand - where Adivasi's make up 26% of the population - lies the world's largest deposit of iron-ore.

Under military occupation

The mining giants are firmly in residence in the north eastern state. According to Xavier Dias, spokesperson for the Jharkhand Mines Area Coordination Committee, the state is now

"a fully militarized zone, there are over a hundred bases with a total of 50,000 official paramilitary troops involved in military action, [plus] the mining corporations' security forces."

As Felix Padel relates in Deconstructing War on Terror, the government intimidation is designed to create a climate of fear and suppression in which dissenting voices are silenced and the "corporations are free to suck out the minerals and forest resources", in the process "transforming large fertile areas into industrial wastelands."

The Adivasi are simply an inconvenient, irrelevant gaggle, that need to be cleared away, or at best put to work collecting scraps of coal or labouring on corporate farms for less than US$ 1 a day, according to ACBTF.

'Terrorism' - the result of India's self-colonization

The Maoist insurgency, whilst containing extreme elements that fit neatly into the box marked 'terrorists', is the direct result a narrow colonial approach to development, for in a way the India has been colonizing itself since independence.

The government has fuelled discontent and anger amongst the marginalized majority, writes Sudeep Chakravarti, "through lack of development, political and administrative corruption, callousness in places where there is less bang for the political buck, mis-governance or non-governance".

Village life for Adivasis and Dalits is largely an interdependent one in which people share what little they have. If there is any hope for the world at all, Arundhati Roy suggests in Trickle Down Revolution,

"it lives low down on the ground, with its arms around the people who go to battle every day to protect their forests, their mountains and their rivers because they know that the forests, the mountains and the rivers protect them.

"The first step towards reimagining a world gone terribly wrong would be to stop the annihilation of those who have a different imagination."

A re-imagination based on right relationship, with one another and environment; a life free from the insatiable drive for material possessions and accumulation to one rooted in sufficiency, simplicity and sharing.



Graham Peebles is director of the Create Trust. He can be reached at:

This article was originally published on Counterpunch.



Previous Articles...


Using this website means you agree to us using simple cookies.

More information here...




Help us keep the Ecologist platform going

Since 2012, the Ecologist has been owned and published by a small UK-based charity called the Resurgence Trust. We work hard to support the kind of independent journalism and comment that we know Ecologist readers enjoy but we need your help to keep going. We do all this on a very small budget with a very small editorial team and so joining the Trust or making a donation will show us you value our work and support the platform which is currently offered as a free service.

Join The Resurgence TrustDonate to support the Resurgence Trust